To: | <autox@autox.team.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Peru Pro |
From: | "Steven T. Ekstrand" <cyberlaw@earthlink.net> |
Date: | Mon, 22 May 2000 11:13:11 -0700 |
A new rule certainly isn't going to solve the problem, but it doesn't sound like the collision this weekend should have occured. I could understand it if the accident had happened during one of the first pairs on the course, but this was apparently one of the last? How many close calls do you need before somebody realizes it may be prudent to move a few cones between run groups. I understand there is risk to what we do. There is risk driving to and from the track. But the most dangerous and obvious situation I can think of is two cars colliding when you have closely spaced track elements. Its hard for me to imagine first that it was setup that way and then that once recognized it wasn't adjusted. I can't applaude the course designer for making a fun and competitive track. He failed in his number one priority---safety. I'd say the competitors who noticed the close calls and dangerous situations let the sport down as well for not making it an immediate issue. -Steve Ekstrand "Newbie and Safety weenie" |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Peru Results are up, Eric W Clements |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Solo II withdrawal - Warning - long, rambling, meaningless dr ivel, Stephen Bernard |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Peru Pro, Mark J. Andy |
Next by Thread: | Re: Peru Pro, Mark J. Andy |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |