Mail Archive Search: <+from:jhadler@rmi.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:jhadler@rmi.net: 280 ]

Total 280 documents matching your query.

241. Re: Should Integra Type R's be in Stock Category? (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Fri, 05 Feb 1999 15:20:02 -0700; Well a little cardiac exercise is a good thing eh? ;-) Yes, smaller cars with more torque and less weight than the Type R. The Type R has a paltry 129 lb-ft of torque all the way up at a dizzying 730; /html/autox/1999-02/msg00242.html (10,076 bytes)
242. Re: Integra Type R's (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Fri, 05 Feb 1999 15:29:45 -0700; Point well taken Mr. Sipe. (omigod! Did I just agree with Mark?) I'll refrain from any further wastes of time on the subject. I'm sure CHuck just wanted to stir some traffic on the list, and kindling; /html/autox/1999-02/msg00244.html (7,259 bytes)
243. Re: Should Integra Type R's be in Stock Category? (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Sun, 07 Feb 1999 12:46:15 -0600; [snip] Ok, I'll bite again... Well, just so you see where I'm coming from. A) I don't have a competetive ride this year B) I may actually be co-driving a G-Stock car for '99 (havn't decided yet) C) T; /html/autox/1999-02/msg00316.html (10,352 bytes)
244. Re: Speed-bleeders stock legal? (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 16:50:12 -0700; Absolutely. And chances are, that protest wouldn't be upheld by the PC anyway. Nah, the worst it'll do is bump you to Prepared. Brake calipers are unrestricted in Prepared, and the bleeder is part of; /html/autox/1999-02/msg00610.html (8,683 bytes)
245. Re: A Different D/E Mod Approach (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1999 10:00:48 -0700; George, unless I'm mistaken, the new STU class that is proposed for the National Tours is something right along those lines. If it's legally registered, and running on DOT tires, it's legal. -Josh2 -; /html/autox/1999-02/msg00670.html (8,009 bytes)
246. Re: Fuel Cut off and Turbos (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1999 10:27:42 -0700; This argument has been bounced around in the past, and I think it boils down to "is the fuel cut a factory implemented method of limiting boost?". You can argue that fuel cut should be unrestricted a; /html/autox/1999-02/msg00677.html (9,090 bytes)
247. Re: Are any of these mods legal in stock? (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 16:47:00 -0700; Yes there is, A-Prepared. And I've heard rumors of a full-tilt AP M3 being built by someone. -Josh2 -- Joshua Hadler '74 914 2.0 CSP/Bi - Hooligan Racing #29 - CONIVOR '87 Quantum Syncro - aka stealt; /html/autox/1999-02/msg00842.html (7,428 bytes)
248. Re: Toyota MR-S JPGs (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Tue, 16 Feb 1999 12:17:09 -0700; If it's being considered for B-Stock, I'll sure be saving my pennies. :-) -Josh2 -- Joshua Hadler '74 914 2.0 CSP/Bi - Hooligan Racing #29 - CONIVOR '87 Quantum Syncro - aka stealth quattro jhadler@r; /html/autox/1999-02/msg00884.html (7,024 bytes)
249. Re: sp changes in fast track (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 10:30:16 -0700; I found the excessive wording in the restructured rules to be excessive. In addition, if the appeal of the protest found the RX's fuel system legal, then why are the rules being changed to make them; /html/autox/1999-02/msg00977.html (9,613 bytes)
250. Re: Brake fluid and Mityvac (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 16:21:07 -0700; But sometimes you get what you pay for. I've boiled away the Castrol LMA stuff before, so I'm rather biased against it. I like Motul 600, but that's a personal preference. Preferably in both blue and; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01008.html (8,293 bytes)
251. Re: Brake fluid and Mityvac (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 18:04:03 -0600; Oh! A sting! You wound me sir! :-P Actually, I've never had any brake over heating problem on an autox course. As the Elder's license plate frame reads..."What? Me brake?". But on the track, the 914s; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01021.html (8,598 bytes)
252. Re: Surge tanks and motor mounts, why not? (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 15:27:56 -0700; Nope. It's fuel sloshing away from the pickup in the gas tank and starving the engine out in high G turns. This happens on more than just a couple of cars, although CSP mazdas seem to be noticeably p; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01090.html (11,197 bytes)
253. Re: sp changes in fast track (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1999 11:31:22 -0700; I've been watching this current debate develop, and loath as I am to step into the middle of a fracas, I feel strangely compelled... must...resist... Huh? I realize I might not have doing the SP thin; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01185.html (18,874 bytes)
254. Re: sp changes in fast track (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1999 16:50:58 -0700; Wow. I spend all afternoon buried in nuts-n-bolts work and come back to find that not only have we seemed to resolve the issue, but Karen and Jay might actually agree. Holy cow! :-) -Josh2 p.s. Jay,; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01205.html (8,864 bytes)
255. Re: removeable Rearview (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 23:55:20 -0600; I don't read it as a weight issue at all. It's clearly a visibility issue, and hence a performance advantage. But the mirror is designed (at least this is how I've heard it) to be easilly removable w; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01314.html (9,560 bytes)
256. Re: removeable Rearview (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 00:45:09 -0600; I'm going to take a step back and not look at the written word, but at the rule. While it does say that it does not allow the removal of the original mirror (and certainly it's a performance advantag; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01316.html (10,135 bytes)
257. That 1,000 number again... (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 15:32:13 -0700; Hi all, I don't wish to dredge up the dreaded "R" debate again, but would like to opinions on this. I have a friend who is interested in getting a somewhat unusual car would likely fall into favorabl; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01425.html (7,942 bytes)
258. Re: SnowFlake Solo Series (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1999 10:07:09 -0700; It really depends on what conditions you anticipate driving in. I live in mountain country, on relatively steep dirt mountain roads (ice, snow, mud, off camber turns, steep inclines etc.). I chose st; /html/autox/1999-01/msg00078.html (9,286 bytes)
259. Re: Tubular K Member/Long Tube Headers (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1999 13:53:20 -0700; Ah, ok... "K member"? Is this a part of the chassis or something? Unless it is an allowable update/backdate or is something that is already covered in the existing rules. Then no you can't. Not knowi; /html/autox/1999-01/msg00093.html (7,807 bytes)
260. Re: Ground effects and down force (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1999 16:22:52 -0700; I'm going out on a limb here, I'm a rocket scientist, not an aerodynamics engineer. But I seem to recall that ground effect for an aircraft is a function of wing area vs. distance from the ground. Th; /html/autox/1999-01/msg00099.html (7,957 bytes)

Current List: 241 - 260
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14]