6pack
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Radiators

To: "David Friedlander" <forzion@maine.rr.com>, <6pack@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: Radiators
From: "Gregory Dito" <g.dito@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 21:58:32 -0500
Dave,

My original 250 radiator is four rows.

Greg

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Friedlander" <forzion@maine.rr.com>
To: <6pack@autox.team.net>
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 9:24 PM
Subject: Re: Radiators


> Whoa, Pete, now *that's* a different perspective and more of what
> I was really concerned about!
> 
> " It seems that some of the cars are fine with a stock rad and some
>   need additional help."
> 
> I can see the fog real clearly now, thanks! :- )
> 
> Can someone verify whether the stock TR250/6 radiator is, in fact,
> 3-row?
> 
> Dave Friedlander
> CF25194UO
> 
> Peter Macholdt wrote:
> 
>   Well, I have to jump in here as the contratian. My 250 has an engine
> with
>   about 10K miles. It is in good shape as indicated by a leak-down test
> and
>   the way it runs.
> 
>   Before last winter, it ran a bit over 1/3 on the temp gauge under
> normal
>   conditions and a bit over 1/2 while idling in really hot weather.
> After last
>   winter, the temp was running about 1/2 at speed and much hotter at
> idle.
> 
>   What happened last winter? Why, a hotter cam and increased
> compression.
> 
>   I tweaked the timing but could not get it to run in a comfortable
> range. The
>   solution was for me to get my radiator re-cored to a 4 row (I think
> stock
>   was 3 row). This helped a lot.
> 
>   I know I'm not the only one with this problem. It seems that some of
> the
>   cars are fine with a stock rad and some need additional help.
> 
>   Peter
>   '68 TR250
> 
>   on 3/8/03 8:19 PM, David Friedlander at forzion@maine.rr.com wrote:
> 
>   > Thanks, Dick, just as I thought. Can't understand why re-coring
> costs
>   > more than a new stock radiator but life is full of mysteries, no? I
>   > had also been curious if running a tweaked engine would cause the
>   > radiator
>   > to be stressed in normal operation. Guess that, even if that was
> true, I
>   > could
>   > always add an electric fan later.
>   >
>   > Thanks again,
>   >
>   > Dave Friedlander
>   > '74 TR6
>   >
>   > Sally or Dick Taylor wrote:
>   >
>   >> Dave---There's nothing wrong with the capacity of the stock
> radiator,
>   >> under most conditions.
>   >>
>   >> I went with the 7 lb. cap years ago after a bout of blowing heater
>   >> control valves. This was about 15 years ago. No problems with
>   >> overheating with the lesser cap.  Or heater valve.
>   >>
>   >> Dick

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>