triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: ???????????rear springs TR3a

To: "'TR-List'" <triumphs@autox.team.net>
Subject: RE: ???????????rear springs TR3a
From: Randall Young <randallyoung@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 19:44:28 -0800
Organization: Navcom Technology, Inc
I believe the modification was to include the spacer.  The parts manual 
seems to show it as part of the spring assembly, which makes sense since it 
is held by the bolt that goes through the center of the spring.

Randall

On Friday, February 26, 1999 5:25 PM, Musson, Carl 
[SMTP:musson@satie.arts.usf.edu] wrote:
>
> Note that at TS26904 there was a modification to the springs to 
accommodate
> for this imbalance.  I am not sure if the driver's side was made stiffer 
or
> the passenger side softer, but the net effect of either is the "level 
with
> the road" concept.  This might account for no spacer in some cars.
>
> (Info from the Piggott book)
>
> Carl
>
>
>
>               -----Original Message-----
>               From:   Michael Thompson [mailto:miket@urgrgcc.edu]
>               Sent:   Friday, February 26, 1999 3:13 PM
>               To:     angelia cole; triumphs@autox.team.net
>               Subject:        Re: ???????????rear springs TR3a
>
>
>               Hi Shannon,
>               Yes there is supposed to be a spacer on the passenger side.
> The purpose is
>               to lower the passenger side of the car, so when the car is
> driven (raced)
>               with only driver on board the car and suspension is level
> and has the
>               correct geometry.
>               Cheers and good luck,
>               Mike Thompson
>               59 Triumph TR3A
>               73 Triumph GT6
>               78 Jaguar XJ6L

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>