Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*ECLIPSE\s+REACTION\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*ECLIPSE\s+REACTION\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. ECLIPSE REACTION (score: 1): Author: BRUBEL51@aol.com; Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 20:48:25 EST; As a GS competitor it has become clearly apparent that the Eclipse is not a GS car, a look at the results from Meridian and Fort Myers states that this car is at best a CS and at least a DS... The Ec; /html/autox/1999-03/msg00682.html (7,840 bytes)
2. Re: ECLIPSE REACTION (score: 1): Author: Mtnman3620@aol.com; Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 21:01:08 EST; << As a GS competitor it has become clearly apparent that the Eclipse is not a GS car, a look at the results from Meridian and Fort Myers states that this car is at best a CS and at least a DS... The; /html/autox/1999-03/msg00683.html (8,533 bytes)
3. Re: ECLIPSE REACTION (score: 1): Author: "Jamie Sculerati" <jamies@mrj.com>; Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 21:40:46 -0500; GS car its during with I That's funny -- before last year, no one considered the Eclipse/Talon a serious GS car -- too heavy, AWD pushed too much, too much turbo lag, etc. Then a few people went to t; /html/autox/1999-03/msg00686.html (9,558 bytes)
4. Re: ECLIPSE REACTION (score: 1): Author: "David Green" <talon-95@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 20:47:39 -0600; I agree. If you look back at the results from nationals last year, it doesn't appear that the Talons/Eclipses were any faster than GS has been in the past. Their times were a little slower than one m; /html/autox/1999-03/msg00687.html (8,685 bytes)
5. Re: ECLIPSE REACTION (score: 1): Author: Heyward K Wagner <sportscar48@juno.com>; Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 21:49:55 EST; Perhaps you should take the issue up with Mark and Wendy Allen. You may have heard of them, they won the GS and the GSL National Championship in an Eclipse. hKw; /html/autox/1999-03/msg00689.html (7,633 bytes)
6. Re: ECLIPSE REACTION (score: 1): Author: "Brian Goodwin" <briang@adnc.com>; Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 19:07:52 -0800; If anyone had declared the Eclipse an overdog in GS a year ago many would have laughed. Seems silly to suddenly throw it from class after some folks put the time and energy in to make a disregarded G; /html/autox/1999-03/msg00691.html (8,900 bytes)
7. Re: ECLIPSE REACTION (score: 1): Author: "Mike Smith" <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 22:12:06 -0500; Kinda funny really. Every autocross article I've ever read (until last year) pounded the Eclipse/Talon/Laser Turbo AWD for being too heavy, having too much lag, not having enough tire, and generally; /html/autox/1999-03/msg00692.html (8,894 bytes)
8. Re: ECLIPSE REACTION (score: 1): Author: Thomas Smith <tasmith@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 19:14:15 -0600; I think its very tough to judge the competitiveness of a particular car based on one or two events. You must consider the level of preperation, the drivers skills, the course design and the weather.; /html/autox/1999-03/msg00693.html (8,532 bytes)
9. Re: ECLIPSE REACTION (score: 1): Author: PATLUV@aol.com; Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 22:18:24 EST; I am not a GS competitor, but I agree that the Eclipse is in the wrong class. The horsepower, weight, 4wd, etc. have proven that this car does deserve to be in a different class. Good luck on getting; /html/autox/1999-03/msg00694.html (7,645 bytes)
10. Re: ECLIPSE REACTION (score: 1): Author: Thomas Smith <tasmith@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 19:25:32 -0600; I think its very tough to judge the competitiveness of a particular car one or two events. You must consider the level of preperation, the drivers skills, the course design and the weather. All will; /html/autox/1999-03/msg00695.html (8,659 bytes)
11. Re: ECLIPSE REACTION (score: 1): Author: Whitney <whitneys@mindspring.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 00:00:40 -0600; Overdog might be a little strong, when you weigh 500lbs more (3100lbs)than a Type R or MX 6 on the same width (6.5") wheel, and do not have the balance of an F-body. I do have to admit the car transi; /html/autox/1999-03/msg00701.html (7,987 bytes)
12. Re: ECLIPSE REACTION (score: 1): Author: Smokerbros@aol.com; Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 01:12:46 EST; << As a GS competitor it has become clearly apparent that the Eclipse is not a GS car, a look at the results from Meridian and Fort Myers states that this car is at best a CS and at least a DS... The; /html/autox/1999-03/msg00702.html (9,540 bytes)
13. Re: ECLIPSE REACTION (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 23:27:49 -0600; Wow. Now that's the first I've heard of this train of thought. G-Stock last year saw five very different cars take the top five spots, and there were plenty of dsm cars trying for the trophy. If it r; /html/autox/1999-03/msg00703.html (10,054 bytes)
14. Re: ECLIPSE REACTION (score: 1): Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com; Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 08:33:03 -0500; Bruce, the reason you got beaten so badly by an Eclipse in Ft. Myers was because John McIver was driving it. John would have beaten you if he were driving that Spec Pinto car. Hell, put him in YOUR c; /html/autox/1999-03/msg00708.html (7,893 bytes)
15. re: ECLIPSE REACTION (score: 1): Author: "Mari L. Clements" <mlc4@psu.edu>; Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 17:22:24 -0500; GS car I wasn't in Ft. Myers ) : but as has been noted, the weather in Meridian did not play fair across heats. It is also true that certain cars are hurt more than others in rainy weather. Yes, I'd; /html/autox/1999-03/msg00755.html (10,215 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]