Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jhadler@rmi.net: 280 ]

Total 280 documents matching your query.

181. Re: Peru Pro results? (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Thu, 20 May 1999 09:56:10 -0700
Uhm, they're already up on the web site. Go see! :-) -Josh2 -- Joshua Hadler '74 914 2.0 CSP/Bi - Hooligan Racing #29 - CONIVOR '87 Quantum Syncro - aka stealth quattro jhadler@rmi.net http://rainbow
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00725.html (6,900 bytes)

182. Re: Eclipse wheels and CSP (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Thu, 27 May 1999 13:49:52 -0700
Don't boo CSP, it's a great class. Here's what you -can- do. You have a few choices: A] Buy a set of cheap steel wheels the right "stock" size. B] Ignore the indexed times and just concentrate on bet
/html/autox/1999-05/msg01009.html (8,664 bytes)

183. Re: ST Classification..any solid rules? (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 1999 11:06:02 -0700
Regardless of weather it can be considered a 'sedan' or 'coupe' or not, it's a forced aspirated car, and is explicitly disallowed for ST. " IV. VEHICLE ELIGIBILITY All sedans/coupes (four seats, four
/html/autox/1999-04/msg00036.html (9,471 bytes)

184. Re: IROC, therefore IAM (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 1999 15:41:54 -0700
Uhm, that's called D-Stock at Nationals.... ;-) Also the Neon Super Solo. :-) -Josh2 -- Joshua Hadler '74 914 2.0 CSP/Bi - Hooligan Racing #29 - CONIVOR '87 Quantum Syncro - aka stealth quattro jhadl
/html/autox/1999-04/msg00053.html (8,526 bytes)

185. Re: SP Proposal (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 1999 10:52:29 -0700
Or simply can't afford to develop their car to that extent. SP, especially ASP can be a rather pricey endeavor. But that should have absolutely no bearing on where or how a car gets classed. Curt, an
/html/autox/1999-04/msg00107.html (9,507 bytes)

186. Re: SP Proposal (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 1999 11:18:07 -0700
So why don't we bump the Miatas to A-Stock? They dominate the class, and there have yet to be shown any other cars in the class that can compete. :-) I know that's an extreme example, but the point i
/html/autox/1999-04/msg00110.html (10,088 bytes)

187. Re: SP Proposal (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 1999 11:48:43 -0700
That was a joke Scotty. Find me -any- ASP car that's fully prepared for way under $20k. Lotus or not. I don't think it can be done. The point is, and I think we can all acknowledge this, ASP is an ex
/html/autox/1999-04/msg00125.html (11,130 bytes)

188. Re: SP Proposal ,Taking back apology (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Sat, 03 Apr 1999 16:01:07 -0700
Geez Adam, a little testy today are we? ASP has a significantly higher index than BSP, that's all. I never implied that ASP is better than BSP, just capapble of turning quicker times. What do you wan
/html/autox/1999-04/msg00221.html (12,485 bytes)

189. Re: Collected team.net comments, questions & answers (long) (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 1999 13:17:14 -0700
HOLLY COW! Let's get a little spin control on this here. I seroiously doubt there are any CSP legal CRX's out there making even close to 160hp at that weight. Try 130 hp or so. But the weight is a go
/html/autox/1999-04/msg00251.html (8,101 bytes)

190. Re: More fuel for the fire? (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 1999 14:36:56 -0700
180? I think it's touted at 140 hp, not 180. If it were 180, I don't think anyone would consider it for B-Stock. -Josh2 -- Joshua Hadler '74 914 2.0 CSP/Bi - Hooligan Racing #29 - CONIVOR '87 Quantum
/html/autox/1999-04/msg00478.html (6,910 bytes)

191. Any left coasters with cargo space bound for Peru? (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 1999 14:21:06 -0700
Hi all, I'm looking for someone who may have available cargo space in their rig that may be bound for the Peru ProSolo that may be willing to transport an engine from the SF bay area to the Denver Co
/html/autox/1999-04/msg00544.html (7,175 bytes)

192. Re: Fwd: Protest Oil Companies (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 1999 13:42:55 -0700
Well gee, that's nice. -IF- you can afford to live anywhere near where you work. -Josh2 -- Joshua Hadler '74 914 2.0 CSP/Bi - Hooligan Racing #29 - CONIVOR '87 Quantum Syncro - aka stealth quattro jh
/html/autox/1999-04/msg00577.html (8,938 bytes)

193. Re: PSI Questions (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 17:49:03 -0700
Yup. Pretty slow. 9 gal is plenty big. I use a 5 gal, and while it can't inflate a fully flat tire more than once, it certainly can help in maintaining any desired pressures at an autox. The real tri
/html/autox/1999-04/msg00676.html (8,511 bytes)

194. Re: SP Proposal - Part II (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 13:40:04 -0700
I spotted one thing that I don't recall in the last proposal. The Fiat X1/9 was split into two classes, and the 1500 was put into what is effectively CSP. I for one, don't believe the X1/9 deserves g
/html/autox/1999-04/msg00767.html (7,500 bytes)

195. Re: Fast pairs.... (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 08:12:37 -0600
and we cannot at all forget these dynamic duos either... Reitmiers Shorts Engstroms Babbs Vachs Yeos Allens Sheltons Elders Kellys And this isn't even taking into consideration the sibling teams or p
/html/autox/1999-04/msg00812.html (7,694 bytes)

196. Re: Safety Tech Procedure (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 1999 15:38:48 -0700
Not running. A tech inspector has to stick their hands into the engine compartment, best to let them do their job safely. Key in, engine off. Definitely. -Josh2 -- Joshua Hadler '74 914 2.0 CSP/Bi -
/html/autox/1999-04/msg01214.html (8,304 bytes)

197. Re: Safety Tech Procedure (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 1999 23:33:13 -0600
Uhm, tell me why you need the engine running to check throttle return? I just see it as an unneccessary risk to have a race car running, no driver in it, and someone grabbing the throttle cable. Espe
/html/autox/1999-04/msg01247.html (8,803 bytes)

198. Re: Fw: SOLO 1 - Closed vs Open Cars (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 1999 23:44:58 -0600
Oh gee, it's here in the book somewhere... I just saw it today as a matter of fact. Now let's see... where is it... Aha! Here it is. SIIR 12.6 (Automotive definitions: page 86, '99 rule book) A. An o
/html/autox/1999-04/msg01248.html (9,910 bytes)

199. Re: The tire thing^n (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1999 14:05:07 -0700
<disclaimer, this is all IMHO, if you feel, believe, or know otherwise, great. I'd love to hear it.> I don't think so. Now, I wasn't there at the time, but my understanding was that although it was a
/html/autox/1999-04/msg01316.html (9,746 bytes)

200. Re: Tire History Lesson - Again (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1999 15:56:33 -0700
But that's just it. Whereas a tire manufacturer is quite likely to produce a reliable product. Tire retread companies are widely varied. Some might be excellent, and others might be really shady. How
/html/autox/1999-04/msg01323.html (9,317 bytes)

Current List: 181 - 200
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14]
This search system is powered by Namazu