triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: upholstery shops

To: "List Triumph" <triumphs@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: upholstery shops
From: "Graham Stretch" <technical@iwnet.screaming.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 19:14:58 +0100charset="iso-8859-1"
References: <af.26aed73.262b47bd@aol.com>
Hi All
I have noticed that Jeff posted one mail, with what may or may not be a
valid point depending on your opinions, whether Jeff should have kept his
opinions to himself or not, I don't intend to comment on, what I do wish to
comment on is the quantity of mail generated by every one getting their
flame throwers out and putting them to work. If we were to let the comment
pass or just send a message of support to the aggrieved party (or not
depending on YOUR opinion) this would all die in minutes rather than
becoming a feud.
We all have different accents and opinions on what offends us or others. So
please holster your weapons and lets get back to the business in hand.
Opinions are like arseholes, we all have one and they are all different.

Graham

----- Original Message -----
From: <DRSkruffy@aol.com>
To: <triumphs@autox.team.net>
Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2000 5:43 PM
Subject: Re: upholstery shops


>
> In a message dated 4/16/00 3:20:45 PM !!!First Boot!!!, bethken@erols.com
> writes:
>
> << Not "every time he says something"... but racist remarks need to be
>  addressed. If you feel otherwise, if your level of tolerance is different
>  than mine, well...that reinforces what I feel is a need for some of us to
>  react to. Whether it's on a bus, in a school, or on the list. >>
>
> You know, I haven't been following the list for that long, but you really
*do
> seem to want to make this a personal battleground. I was thrilled when I
came
> here and saw people, well MOST people, being friendly and helpful. It was
> quite a change from the backbiting and sniping on the BMW list. It didn't
> last long though. Soon there was a war here, instigated by yourself. I was
> very relieved when it died down and I cringed when I read your recent post
> because I knew it would generate more non-LBC content.
>
> The comment may not have been "PC", but then I'm not either. I just didn't
> know the reach of the PC Police were on the list. I suppose if you think
that
> you have to spew your agenda and think you can accomplish anything, well,
all
> I can say is Rotsa Ruck.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>