To: | <autox@autox.team.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: course design |
From: | "Jamie Sculerati" <jamies@mrj.com> |
Date: | Sat, 6 Mar 1999 17:55:26 -0500 |
-----Original Message----- From: Popsracr@aol.com <Popsracr@aol.com> >Course designers should take note to make courses that are not visually >confusing. I've seen a few designs where even the best drivers have >difficulty due to visual course design problems. There's really a pretty simple fix to this: the next gate/box/slalom/wall of death or other significant course feature should be within the driver's field of view along the (course-intended) direction of travel when exiting the preceeding gate. Say no more than a 15 or 20 degree offset. This makes the *course* easy to follow, and drivers can concentrate on figuring out the fast line rather than figuring out which of those gates visible through the left window is the correct one this time around. Looking two or three features ahead shouldn't mean looking south while driving north to the next gate. This rule of thumb doesn't preclude complex courses -- quite the contrary! It also doesn't prevent reuse of key course features during a run. It does prevent event results showing multiple drivers with two and three off-course runs -- which is a fine indicator of a poorly-designed course. Jamie '92 Prelude Si Speed Demon Racing http://www.mindspring.com/~jsculerati/sdr |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: M Coupe?, Josh Sirota |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: course memorizing, Popsracr |
Previous by Thread: | Re: course design, RacerRay52 |
Next by Thread: | Re: course design, washburn |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |