Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Spitfire\s+Misfire\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Spitfire\s+Misfire\?\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. Spitfire Misfire? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 22:34:45 -0600; I am the proud owner of a 1970 Triumph Spitfire (For 31 hours now). It is upon close inspection a very unique little Spitfire. This was the last year of the round tail Spitfire, and a very unque year; /html/triumphs/1997-10/msg01894.html (7,923 bytes)
2. Re: Spitfire Misfire? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 22:03:19 -0700; While it may be a rather unique factory built vehicle, It is more likely the dpo got rather creative with the vehicle's Markings. Some earlier, some later. Joe Curry '63 Spit; /html/triumphs/1997-10/msg01896.html (8,987 bytes)
3. Re: Spitfire Misfire? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: 23 Oct 97 8:58:21; is upon close inspection a very unique little Spitfire. This was the last year of the round tail Spitfire, and a very unque year in it's own right. The car has decent original paint, has never been i; /html/triumphs/1997-10/msg01907.html (8,557 bytes)
4. RE: Spitfire Misfire? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 23 Oct 1997 08:23:23 -0500; Hey Andy, Welcome to the 1970 Mk3 club, there are a few of use on the list. My car is badged as follows; Bullseye on the front left of the bonnet (expensive little bugger) Spitfire on the rear quater; /html/triumphs/1997-10/msg01908.html (9,102 bytes)
5. RE: Spitfire Misfire? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 23 Oct 1997 09:51:47 +0600 (EDT); On 23 Oct 1997 Martin_A._Secrest@NEB.VOA.GOV replied: And Bill Munts added: Right, Bill, or at least as "right" as anyone can be in documenting details on these cars. :-) The "Roundel" badge on the; /html/triumphs/1997-10/msg01911.html (9,685 bytes)
6. RE: Spitfire Misfire? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: 23 Oct 97 9:55:40; U.S.-spec. stop/tail lamp lens, which is NOT the same as the 1962-69 Spitfire?<< Not me, sorry. I ran into a guy this summer at the Richmond Triumph show who had just bought a 70 Spit, and he encount; /html/triumphs/1997-10/msg01913.html (7,890 bytes)
7. RE: Spitfire Misfire? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 23 Oct 1997 10:24:18 +0600 (EDT); I believe they simply are unavailable new from any source. Of course, the 1962-69 lens will fit the lamp, but it just ain't right! Interestingly, Victoria British was the last vendor in the U.S. -- m; /html/triumphs/1997-10/msg01914.html (9,143 bytes)
8. Re: Spitfire Misfire? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 23 Oct 1997 07:39:01 -0700; All you guys who are discussing the 1970 "different" Tail Light Lens. What is the difference? I ask because in the box of goodies I got with my Spit, There was an "odd ball" lens that does not look l; /html/triumphs/1997-10/msg01916.html (10,557 bytes)
9. Re: Spitfire Misfire? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 23 Oct 1997 10:47:34 +0600 (EDT); Sorry I don't have part numbers on hand. ISTR that the "correct" lens starts with 5457xxxx and the 1962-69 lens with 5458xxxx. The later lens looks a lot like the earlier, more common one, except tha; /html/triumphs/1997-10/msg01917.html (9,315 bytes)
10. Re: Spitfire Misfire? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 23 Oct 1997 08:00:46 -0700; Okay, As I type withone hand, I am reading the numbers off the "new Style" lens. It reads, L847 ENGLAND across the top line and beneath that it says SAE ST 69 and of course LUCAS across the bottom. A; /html/triumphs/1997-10/msg01919.html (9,859 bytes)
11. Re: Spitfire Misfire? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 23 Oct 1997 11:04:08 -0500; Ditto regarding Bill's description of badge type/locations. Mine is same. Martin Libhart 1970 Spitfire Mk. 3 FDU75026L; /html/triumphs/1997-10/msg01928.html (9,106 bytes)
12. Re: Spitfire Misfire? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 23 Oct 1997 09:12:50 -0700; Is the above referenced "TRIUMPH" on the boot lid, a single plaque that has chrome letters on a cream colored enamal background surrounded by a chrome border? If so, I have one of these too. Joe Curr; /html/triumphs/1997-10/msg01930.html (9,953 bytes)
13. Re: Spitfire Misfire? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 23 Oct 1997 11:32:11 -0500; Now, my question to you three: do any of you have the "correct" original U.S.-spec. stop/tail lamp lens, which is NOT the same as the 1962-69 Spitfire? :-) --Andy Sorry to "eavesdrop". I do have the; /html/triumphs/1997-10/msg01932.html (8,899 bytes)
14. RE: Spitfire Misfire? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: 23 Oct 97 9:55:40; U.S.-spec. stop/tail lamp lens, which is NOT the same as the 1962-69 Spitfire?<< Not me, sorry. I ran into a guy this summer at the Richmond Triumph show who had just bought a 70 Spit, and he encount; /html/triumphs/1997-10/msg01970.html (8,252 bytes)
15. Re: Spitfire Misfire? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: 23 Oct 97 8:58:21; is upon close inspection a very unique little Spitfire. This was the last year of the round tail Spitfire, and a very unque year in it's own right. The car has decent original paint, has never been i; /html/triumphs/1997-10/msg01985.html (9,116 bytes)
16. RE: Spitfire Misfire? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 23 Oct 1997 08:23:23 -0500; Hey Andy, Welcome to the 1970 Mk3 club, there are a few of use on the list. My car is badged as follows; Bullseye on the front left of the bonnet (expensive little bugger) Spitfire on the rear quater; /html/triumphs/1997-10/msg01988.html (9,455 bytes)
17. RE: Spitfire Misfire? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 23 Oct 1997 10:24:18 +0600 (EDT); I believe they simply are unavailable new from any source. Of course, the 1962-69 lens will fit the lamp, but it just ain't right! Interestingly, Victoria British was the last vendor in the U.S. -- m; /html/triumphs/1997-10/msg02002.html (9,122 bytes)
18. RE: Spitfire Misfire? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 23 Oct 1997 09:51:47 +0600 (EDT); On 23 Oct 1997 Martin_A._Secrest@NEB.VOA.GOV replied: And Bill Munts added: Right, Bill, or at least as "right" as anyone can be in documenting details on these cars. :-) The "Roundel" badge on the; /html/triumphs/1997-10/msg02005.html (9,757 bytes)
19. Re: Spitfire Misfire? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 23 Oct 1997 11:32:11 -0500; Now, my question to you three: do any of you have the "correct" original U.S.-spec. stop/tail lamp lens, which is NOT the same as the 1962-69 Spitfire? :-) --Andy Sorry to "eavesdrop". I do have the; /html/triumphs/1997-10/msg02012.html (8,342 bytes)
20. RE: Spitfire Misfire? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 23 Oct 1997 08:23:23 -0500; Hey Andy, Welcome to the 1970 Mk3 club, there are a few of use on the list. My car is badged as follows; Bullseye on the front left of the bonnet (expensive little bugger) Spitfire on the rear quater; /html/triumphs/1997-10/msg02042.html (9,099 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]