Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*What\'s\s+wrong\s+with\s+this\s+pitcure\?\!\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*What\'s\s+wrong\s+with\s+this\s+pitcure\?\!\?\s*$/: 32 ]

Total 32 documents matching your query.

1. RE: What's wrong with this pitcure?!? (score: 1): Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com; Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 09:31:31 -0500; on Howard had a large hand in what SM rules made it to the SEB, yes. NO. Every rule goes in front of the SEB. Every single one. If the SEB chooses to trust the opinion of a man with the experience an; /html/autox/2000-12/msg00009.html (11,246 bytes)
2. Re: What's wrong with this pitcure?!? (score: 1): Author: Paul Foster <pfoster@gdi.net>; Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2000 10:22:39 -0500; AFAIK, Howard is not supposed to be making policy decisions that affect the Solo II classes. Howard is our paid employee who is supposed to be working for us, the club members. If the decision which; /html/autox/2000-12/msg00013.html (8,340 bytes)
3. Re: What's wrong with this pitcure?!? (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 10:50:56 -0500 (EST); Which part of "I'm forwarding your letter to the SEB" did you fail to read in his reply? Last I checked Howard and Dennis weren't making decisions on their own. Certainly they have influence in that; /html/autox/2000-12/msg00019.html (8,761 bytes)
4. Re: What's wrong with this pitcure?!? (score: 1): Author: Paul Foster <pfoster@gdi.net>; Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2000 10:56:21 -0500; - -Arthur ("Fed up with conditional literacy" edition.) responds: <<<...and I suggest that Mr. Foster take reading lessons, or at least make sure that his brain is in gear before engaging his fingers; /html/autox/2000-12/msg00021.html (10,166 bytes)
5. Re: What's wrong with this pitcure?!? (score: 1): Author: Paul Foster <pfoster@gdi.net>; Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2000 11:00:29 -0500; CHD replies: <<<I'm sure Howard was not speaking as Pro Solo manager, but representing the SEB and its subcommittees. Howard does not classify cars, but he can speak for the classification philosophi; /html/autox/2000-12/msg00023.html (8,622 bytes)
6. Re: What's wrong with this pitcure?!? (score: 1): Author: Karl Witt <witt@mediaone.net>; Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2000 11:06:34 -0500; he never said he made a decision. he merely gave insight as to the current thinking as WHOLE about the porsches. if you had read the first bit of the e-mail, he said it was forwarded to the SEB. damn; /html/autox/2000-12/msg00024.html (8,946 bytes)
7. Re: What's wrong with this pitcure?!? (score: 1): Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>; Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2000 11:28:47 -0500; In my opinion, image is not necessarily a bad element to include in classing decisions. Marketing is important. For example, whether the M3 belongs in ESP or not on performance merits, having it ther; /html/autox/2000-12/msg00027.html (8,223 bytes)
8. Re: What's wrong with this pitcure?!? (score: 1): Author: Smokerbros@aol.com; Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 11:54:08 EST; I can give you some insight into STOCK classification philosophy, and I think the philosophy that extends to SP, and probably SM. Certain makes of cars are seen as being "greater than the sum of thei; /html/autox/2000-12/msg00031.html (9,148 bytes)
9. Re: What's wrong with this pitcure?!? (score: 1): Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>; Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 12:15:49 -0500; Paul, you may reach that conclusion anyway but at least use accurate information: The fastest M3 in AS was 1:12.4 while the fastest SM car was 1:08.0 It's difficult to compare classes that ran at dif; /html/autox/2000-12/msg00033.html (8,467 bytes)
10. Re: What's wrong with this pitcure?!? (score: 1): Author: Paul Foster <pfoster@gdi.net>; Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2000 12:16:08 -0500; Unless you allow wheel-to-wheel racing and dragging at autocross sites I don't think you are attract many people from the riceburner crowd to justify the effort. The problem is actually caused by us; /html/autox/2000-12/msg00034.html (9,029 bytes)
11. Re: What's wrong with this pitcure?!? (score: 1): Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>; Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2000 13:15:54 -0500; In the end, a 3000 pound 250 horse car won't be competitive in the sedan version of SM either. This is a very high-buck class. Just wait until people get into fabricating custom suspension pieces...; /html/autox/2000-12/msg00040.html (8,344 bytes)
12. Re: What's wrong with this pitcure?!? (score: 1): Author: "msmith2" <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 23:40:24 -0500; Umm, you really need to stop and look at what's possible with SM's 1st off, ANY engine labeled with your marque's name is legal. 2nd, ANY forced induction is legal, given engine size limits. I think; /html/autox/2000-12/msg00070.html (8,426 bytes)
13. Re: What's wrong with this pitcure?!? (score: 1): Author: washburn <washburn@dwave.net>; Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2000 18:41:54 -0600; I believe he said he was addressing the philosophy behind their exclusion. I took that as meaning it was not his personal opinion. I guess I don't see how this is this a bad thing? Pat; /html/autox/2000-12/msg00140.html (8,505 bytes)
14. Re: What's wrong with this pitcure?!? (score: 1): Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>; Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 12:18:25 -0600; So, instead of mere acknowledgement, he gets dialogue? This is wonderful! The writer is now armed with information that may be raised in opposition to his position, thus enabling him to better count; /html/autox/2000-12/msg00163.html (9,519 bytes)
15. What's wrong with this pitcure?!? (score: 1): Author: Paul Foster <pfoster@gdi.net>; Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 10:21:07 -0500; A friend of mine is campaigning on a Porsche mailing list to get people to write letters to the SEB to allow Porsche 944/824/968 cars in SM, something I have been arguing ever since Dennis Grant deci; /html/autox/2000-11/msg00528.html (9,976 bytes)
16. Re: What's wrong with this pitcure?!? (score: 1): Author: SCCARcr@aol.com; Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 10:33:04 EST; I may be mistaken but I believe I saw a Toyota Supra in SM at a local event this year. Is this a car that is allowed in that class or was it just misclassed? Brad Pyatt 98 Neon ACR 91 DS Rockwall, TX; /html/autox/2000-11/msg00530.html (7,665 bytes)
17. Re: What's wrong with this pitcure?!? (score: 1): Author: TeamZ3@aol.com; Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 10:43:30 EST; Well I suggest that Paul Foster spend less time complaining and more time learning how the SCCA Solo2 classification system works, because based on the statement below he doesn't have a clue. The onl; /html/autox/2000-11/msg00531.html (8,516 bytes)
18. Re: What's wrong with this pitcure?!? (score: 1): Author: Paul Foster <pfoster@gdi.net>; Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 10:49:11 -0500; Mark Sipe responds: <<<The only thing wrong with this picture is that the artist is color-blind. >>> Color-blind?!? Here a National Champion sends a letter to the SEB stating that he believes the 4 s; /html/autox/2000-11/msg00532.html (8,235 bytes)
19. Re: What's wrong with this pitcure?!? (score: 1): Author: "Arthur Emerson" <vreihen@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 16:17:08; ...and I suggest that Mr. Foster take reading lessons, or at least make sure that his brain is in gear before engaging his fingers on his keyboard. What part of Howard's response did you NOT understa; /html/autox/2000-11/msg00533.html (10,405 bytes)
20. RE: What's wrong with this pitcure?!? (score: 1): Author: "Larry Joffe" <spdrcr5@bigfoot.com>; Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 11:17:40 -0500; You were not mistaken. The Toyota Supra TT is allowed in SM. As a matter of fact Kent Rafferty won the Nationals in his this year. The rules don't make 100% sense, but unfortunately that is how they; /html/autox/2000-11/msg00534.html (8,930 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]