Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Solo\s+Vee\s+\-\s+SEB\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Solo\s+Vee\s+\-\s+SEB\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Solo Vee - SEB (score: 1): Author: MBD96@aol.com; Date: Thu, 1 Apr 1999 08:35:56 EST; << After hearing this, my gut reaction is to write a letter suggesting that the F500 be moved back into CM (dragging the F440 kicking and screaming along with it), and that the Solo Vee be moved to a; /html/autox/1999-04/msg00007.html (7,251 bytes)
2. Re: Solo Vee - SEB (score: 1): Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>; Date: Thu, 01 Apr 1999 11:49:51 -0500; I got an awful lot of replies to my late night proposal, and while not a soul agreed with me, I appreciate that nobody flamed me either. Thank you. I didn't mean to be inflammatory, though I recogniz; /html/autox/1999-04/msg00029.html (9,184 bytes)
3. Re: Solo Vee - SEB (score: 1): Author: "Larry R. Metz" <75304.1645@compuserve.com>; Date: Thu, 1 Apr 1999 14:05:52 -0500; I want to respond to the comments about the Solo Vee classing. I likewise want to assure everyone there is no flaming intended. I am a vee owner, started soloing when they were real vees. I agree tha; /html/autox/1999-04/msg00042.html (11,394 bytes)
4. Re: Solo Vee - SEB (score: 1): Author: Josh Sirota <jss@marimba.com>; Date: Thu, 01 Apr 1999 15:08:51 -0800; Very few autocrossing FFs still have a realistic resale market in the road racing world. Josh; /html/autox/1999-04/msg00055.html (7,077 bytes)
5. Re: Solo Vee - SEB (score: 1): Author: MBD96@aol.com; Date: Thu, 1 Apr 1999 20:07:22 EST; << With the F500 back in CM, we'd all see a lot more local competition, and could once again be a major force at Nationals. >> First, I don't understand the logic behind this statement. Why would it; /html/autox/1999-04/msg00059.html (7,868 bytes)
6. Re: Solo Vee - SEB (score: 1): Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>; Date: Fri, 02 Apr 1999 00:18:03 -0500; More cars in the class. And people like to join a big local class, but don't like to join a class with only one or two regular competitors. Around here, anyway. Deeper trophies, and deeper talent. Pe; /html/autox/1999-04/msg00076.html (8,989 bytes)
7. Re: Solo Vee - SEB (score: 1): Author: "Eric Linnhoff" <eric10mm@qni.com>; Date: Fri, 2 Apr 1999 08:45:03 -0600; == On the other hand, aren't most autocross FF cars usually retired road race cars? That's usually the only way most of us poor autocross guys could ever afford them with brand new FF cars priced ov; /html/autox/1999-04/msg00088.html (7,959 bytes)
8. Solo Vee - SEB (score: 1): Author: Autovee@aol.com; Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 08:09:47 EDT; The following letter was sent to the SEB this week in an attempt to furthur the understanding of why Solo Vees are as they are. The misconception that the 'new tech' is a potential advantage that we; /html/autox/1999-04/msg01044.html (10,255 bytes)
9. Solo Vee - SEB (score: 1): Author: Autovee@aol.com; Date: Wed, 31 Mar 1999 20:04:13 EST; Solo Drivers The following is a letter from Solo Vee Owners Association to the Solo Events Board. The SVOA Members have deliberated long and hard on these issues. We feel that the proposal is timely; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01942.html (14,032 bytes)
10. Re: Solo Vee - SEB (score: 1): Author: MBD96@aol.com; Date: Wed, 31 Mar 1999 21:58:14 EST; << What we would like to propose is a change in the cylinder head specifications. We request that this change be implemented by the SEB at the earliest possible time. The details and the rational for; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01946.html (8,241 bytes)
11. Re: Solo Vee - SEB (score: 1): Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>; Date: Wed, 31 Mar 1999 22:36:00 -0500; Wow. This one sure hits me right out of the blue. To hear the Solo Vee guys get together and admit that the car can never be nationally competitive and surrender the whole parity thing is quite an ab; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01948.html (8,066 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]