Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:kevin_stevens@hotmail.com: 77 ]

Total 77 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Bremertom Tire Manufacturer Results!!! (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Stevens" <kevin_stevens@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2000 14:31:00 PDT
??? -- KeS ________________________________________________________________________
/html/autox/2000-08/msg00039.html (7,166 bytes)

22. Re: Scooter legality for Solo II Nationals (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Stevens" <kevin_stevens@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2000 16:35:52 PDT
Let's see, it's LIKE a skate board, but LESS stable - sure why not? (Better pack a pair of new sneakers, though, just in case.) KeS ___________________________________________________________________
/html/autox/2000-08/msg00170.html (9,191 bytes)

23. Re: Z06 Corvette and Nationals? (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Stevens" <kevin_stevens@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2000 14:40:29 PDT
It won't be. I can't find the rule right now, but the car model year must be no greater than the current calendar year. This can be excepted by petitioning the SEB with info that essentially says tha
/html/autox/2000-08/msg00331.html (8,517 bytes)

24. Re: Z06 Corvette and Nationals? (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Stevens" <kevin_stevens@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2000 14:50:28 PDT
Here it is: 3.1 Cars designated as being of a model year later than the current year are not eligible to compete in Divisional, Tour, or Solo II National Championships, unless they have been specific
/html/autox/2000-08/msg00332.html (8,669 bytes)

25. Re: Z06 Corvette and Nationals? (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Stevens" <kevin_stevens@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2000 16:32:37 PDT
That's "2000 and OLDER". Another way to say it is that a 2001 base model C5 wouldn't be eligible either. KeS ________________________________________________________________________
/html/autox/2000-08/msg00339.html (8,673 bytes)

26. Re: Z06 Corvette and Nationals? (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Stevens" <kevin_stevens@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2000 16:39:31 PDT
Note that none of this has anything to do with it being legal at Nationals this year. It rolled off the line as a 2001 model, it's not legal (by default) at the 2000 Nationals, period. Neither is a 2
/html/autox/2000-08/msg00340.html (10,374 bytes)

27. Re: RX7 displacement (was:Z06 Corvette and Nationals?) (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Stevens" <kevin_stevens@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 13:19:39 PDT
(thumbing through Lewis Carroll books to find "inferious" and "pugniable"!) KeS ________________________________________________________________________
/html/autox/2000-08/msg00486.html (9,764 bytes)

28. Re: Z3 in EP? Was: New Miata (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Stevens" <kevin_stevens@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 14:40:15 PDT
Is there any other kind? ;) KeS ________________________________________________________________________
/html/autox/2000-08/msg00497.html (7,185 bytes)

29. Re: C5 Computer Location (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Stevens" <kevin_stevens@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2000 01:08:22 PDT
They moved the main ECM unit after the 1997 model year, if I recall correctly. It was right behind the passenger front wheel well, funny how lots of those cars kept dying in heavy rains... What I don
/html/autox/2000-08/msg00615.html (7,568 bytes)

30. Re: Rear Shock Access for SS & BSP Corvettes (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Stevens" <kevin_stevens@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 11:18:33 PDT
It seems reasonable to allow people to cut holes for speakers. I don't see that it's then necessary or reasonable to allow them to take the speakers out and use the holes as access ports. KeS _______
/html/autox/2000-08/msg00767.html (8,996 bytes)

31. Why shock access is an issue. (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Stevens" <kevin_stevens@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 10:07:00 PDT
How about not wanting to cut holes in a new car that you intend to sell (or have leased)? More importantly, take the case of Driver A who is shopping for shocks. The most wonderfullest shocks for th
/html/autox/2000-08/msg00874.html (9,555 bytes)

32. Re: Must Read for those in Fstock with Fbodies 1993+ boundary="------------993D4A9E868EB812798F2085" (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Stevens" <kevin_stevens@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 11:04:02 PDT
I remember when Perry Kincy and I got some of the first of these shocks for our ESP cars back in the day - got the whole thing taken apart, installed, and buttoned back together, dropped my car off t
/html/autox/2000-08/msg00882.html (10,063 bytes)

33. Re: (insert location) Shock Access for (insert car) (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Stevens" <kevin_stevens@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 13:57:42 PDT
Then let the proposal stand on it's merit - ask for an allowance to drill holes to allow shock adjustment. That seems more straightforward than trying to leverage the C&C rule to put faux speakers in
/html/autox/2000-08/msg00916.html (9,829 bytes)

34. Re: Shock access - am I stupid? (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Stevens" <kevin_stevens@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 16:11:14 PDT
The former. You can't go drilling holes and manufacturing bits to tweak your car in Stock class. I'm sorry, it's wrong. Can you drill holes in your firewall to make your front swaybar adjustable betw
/html/autox/2000-08/msg00925.html (14,418 bytes)

35. Re: Shock access - am I stupid? (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Stevens" <kevin_stevens@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 16:16:04 PDT
Ok, now take the scenario where my competitor and I have identical shocks which cannot be adjusted at the event unless an access port is cut. He does it, I don't. We both have major oversteer after
/html/autox/2000-08/msg00926.html (9,227 bytes)

36. Re: sorry, but ZO6 Vett again (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Stevens" <kevin_stevens@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 10:32:56 PDT
You're perfectly entitled to feel this way. But you're wrong. ;) Hardtop, not coupe. I agree it isn't a new model. Hardtop, not coupe. Your point is that the SS listing for the C5 (97+) qualifies as
/html/autox/2000-08/msg01141.html (9,997 bytes)

37. Re: sorry, but ZO6 Vett again - sorry is right :-) (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Stevens" <kevin_stevens@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 10:40:18 PDT
Gee, and I was agreeing with Jim all the way up to here... BZZZZZT! 3.1 comes before the individual preparation section rules. It applies to all classes. KeS _________________________________________
/html/autox/2000-08/msg01142.html (8,372 bytes)

38. Re: I'm coming to Kansas! (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Stevens" <kevin_stevens@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 10:19:52 PDT
Y'know, I really hope to not have to wade through 1000 mini-bios, delete key or no... KeS _________________________________________________________________________ Share information about yourself, c
/html/autox/2000-08/msg01371.html (8,386 bytes)

39. Re: Sequential Stock Classes (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Stevens" <kevin_stevens@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2000 16:12:44 PDT
Simple != easy Complex != difficult KeS BTW, while you're at it chop off that front bar allowance. ________________________________________________________________________
/html/autox/2000-07/msg00208.html (9,981 bytes)

40. Re: Stock class rules was (Re: Sequential Stock Classes) (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Stevens" <kevin_stevens@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2000 13:04:04 PDT
Cost, I'd imagine. Don't all cars come with at least one set of stock wheels these days? My suggestion for implementing changes like this would be to grandfather them. Say that any post-2001 model c
/html/autox/2000-07/msg00303.html (10,469 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]
This search system is powered by Namazu