autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: RX7 displacement (was:Z06 Corvette and Nationals?)

To: autox@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: RX7 displacement (was:Z06 Corvette and Nationals?)
From: "Kevin Stevens" <kevin_stevens@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 13:19:39 PDT
(thumbing through Lewis Carroll books to find "inferious" and "pugniable"!)

KeS


>From: "Chuck McMillion" <chuck@decaturnet.com>
>Reply-To: "Chuck McMillion" <chuck@decaturnet.com>
>To: <autox@autox.team.net>
>Subject: Re: RX7 displacement (was:Z06 Corvette and Nationals?)
>Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 15:11:00 -0500
>
>um,
>no
>
>         Displacemnt is measured by the volume of "open"space in the 
>epichrod
>with the rotor in it.
>
>They displace 654 cc per rotor (13B)
>multipling by 1.4 is merely a tool used by the SCCA to specify Pressure
>charged cars vs Naturally aspirated.
>
>It isn't the Rotaries fault that a Piston engine is inferious by basic
>design (some comapies have come in leaps and bound in Pston engine
>technology ie Honda VTEC)
>
>there are three rotor faces,  but the displacment between them is still
>654cc (divide that by 3 and that is the per rotor face volume.)  you are
>mutiplying it by 9 in your calculations
>
>You aren'y being pugniable about all this are you?
>I am not, i am simply trying to help you understand the rotary from a
>rotorhed.
>
>Take it easy,
>Chuck

________________________________________________________________________


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>