Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:eric@mail.brown911.com: 394 ]

Total 394 documents matching your query.

21. RE: A new spoon in the FSM pot (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Salem" <eric@mail.brown911.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 15:59:19 -0600
I like to propose a new rule to be implemented as soon as possible: [proposal] For those classes where possessing the FSM is required, it must be presented with the car and available for all competi
/html/autox/2004-03/msg00207.html (8,531 bytes)

22. RE: A new spoon in the FSM pot (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Salem" <eric@mail.brown911.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 17:45:37 -0600
There are a weath of stock class cars competing presently that are 5-20 yrs old, I can only assume the owners have the required documentation. Ahh, it's the Assume thing.... The FSM for my car isn't
/html/autox/2004-03/msg00209.html (7,905 bytes)

23. RE: Speaking of Natz, Pavement (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Salem" <eric@mail.brown911.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 15:05:56 -0600
I think your idea is great and can be easily accomplished. The first step is to hit the lottery and fork over several million to SCCA or the MTAA to cover the costs. Ohhh, you didn't just hit the lo
/html/autox/2004-03/msg00229.html (7,178 bytes)

24. RE: New Mazda commercial (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Salem" <eric@mail.brown911.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 13:20:18 -0600
During a test drive, I had a salesman actually direct me to a road he said was "fun". He actually told me that I could drive it, shall we say, "briskly". I didn't know that he didn't have his seat b
/html/autox/2004-03/msg00263.html (7,231 bytes)

25. RE: [evolution-disc.] Update Question (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Salem" <eric@mail.brown911.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 14:42:43 -0600
you really needed the extra 20 hp... So, do you also "need" the carbon fiber hood? Charley you've been around racing long enough to know that 'need' is a function of the balance in the checking acco
/html/autox/2004-03/msg00282.html (8,153 bytes)

26. RE: Good SEB Letter? (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Salem" <eric@mail.brown911.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 18:04:15 -0600
Or if you want send it on list and I'll send one myself. e '72 911 (in FP for trivial reasons that are easily changed) Hi all, I'm going to start my campaign to get the earlier air-cooled (non-turbo)
/html/autox/2004-02/msg00003.html (7,405 bytes)

27. RE: Motorsport Mile (was Re: Portage Grand Prix?) (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Salem" <eric@mail.brown911.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 01:56:46 -0600
The successor events, however, *are* SCCA events, run by Nebraska Region in 2003 and scheduled in 2004, according to SCCA rules -- and on an airport apron, not the city's downtown streets. The accid
/html/autox/2004-02/msg00094.html (7,437 bytes)

28. The death of prepared? (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Salem" <eric@mail.brown911.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 17:01:08 -0600
Now we will have to buy Injection, expensive 17+ inch wheels, re-do suspensions and gearing for DOT tires AND for some really silly & unexplained reason have a shop manual? 1. Injection, well heck th
/html/autox/2004-02/msg00182.html (8,181 bytes)

29. RE: The death of prepared? (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Salem" <eric@mail.brown911.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 21:25:11 -0600
Okay, you get protested for having too narrow track, or altered wheelbase. How do you prove your legality? With the idea that Prepared is stagnant, and needs new blood to survive, let the SEB and PA
/html/autox/2004-02/msg00186.html (8,864 bytes)

30. RE: The death of prepared? (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Salem" <eric@mail.brown911.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 23:14:30 -0600
If you are protested, and provide a shop manual, and it doesn't have the info we want, you've complied with the rule. The burden of proff shifts to the protestor. If you're protested and supply noth
/html/autox/2004-02/msg00191.html (8,607 bytes)

31. RE: The death of prepared? (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Salem" <eric@mail.brown911.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 00:01:37 -0600
Well, that's not the way it's done. The protestee has to provide certain documentation as to how (s)he has prepared the car. If the protest doesn't include something that's in your shop manual, then
/html/autox/2004-02/msg00193.html (8,145 bytes)

32. RE: Prepared protests - wheel base (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Salem" <eric@mail.brown911.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 18:30:23 -0600
Since you already own it, and since you've already read it Ahh -- dood, lot's of us can't get factory shop manuals for our cars. I'm lucky to have one for my '72 911, but that was only via Hook, Cro
/html/autox/2004-02/msg00201.html (8,332 bytes)

33. RE: Prepared protests - wheel base (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Salem" <eric@mail.brown911.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 18:33:39 -0600
Since you already own it, and since you've already read it Ahh -- dood, lot's of us can't get factory shop manuals for our cars. I'm lucky to have one for my '72 911, but that was only via Hook, Cro
/html/autox/2004-02/msg00202.html (8,328 bytes)

34. RE: Prepared protests - wheel base (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Salem" <eric@mail.brown911.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 19:29:49 -0600
Don, I see your point but we're not talking about Stock. If the only reason the SEB can bring up to require a Factory Shop Manual is track size why can't they just look in the rulebook? It's there in
/html/autox/2004-02/msg00204.html (11,407 bytes)

35. RE: track and prepared (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Salem" <eric@mail.brown911.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 14:27:17 -0600
I'm willing to believe that the manual is truly unneeded in Prepared, if you can convince me (and the rest of the SEB). The thought was that the manual is needed to interpret how some of the Section
/html/autox/2004-02/msg00219.html (7,561 bytes)

36. RE: Prepared protest, etc. (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Salem" <eric@mail.brown911.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 00:51:55 -0600
I believe NO ONE should be kicked out initially for "incorrect" documentation, only a COMPLETE LACK of documentation, Eric, even if it is an old "Haynes" manual!! And that's my point. For some of th
/html/autox/2004-02/msg00229.html (6,945 bytes)

37. RE: Lotus Elise (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Salem" <eric@mail.brown911.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 19:52:45 -0600
PS: Since you guys are going to debate this anyway, you might also consider how the C6, C6 Z06, and the '04 S2000 all fit into the mix with the Elise and the existing SS/AS cars. And do so without a
/html/autox/2004-01/msg00031.html (8,806 bytes)

38. RE: Insurance Question. (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Salem" <eric@mail.brown911.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:43:04 -0600
Parish-Heacock Insurance 800 274 1804 On Dick R's advice to our list I call Parish-Heacock. Oh my god! They haved the rate to insure the '72 911 AND increased the coverage. Instead of paying $250 ea
/html/autox/2004-01/msg00081.html (6,673 bytes)

39. RE: Help save motorcyclists and pedestrians (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Salem" <eric@mail.brown911.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 01:41:51 -0600
I think you're putting the horse WAY ahead of the cart. No matter what happens in South Dakota, I will wait for a lot more evidence (like concrete proof) before I support any such thing. Well what a
/html/autox/2003-12/msg00014.html (7,662 bytes)

40. RE: [evolution-disc.] regulating boost limits in SP, let's (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Salem" <eric@mail.brown911.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 23:54:54 -0600
14.10.C say (in part) "No changes are allowed to waste gates, pressure sensors or their location, and to other turbocharger or supercharger boost limiting system." and also "...any modifications whi
/html/autox/2003-12/msg00038.html (8,130 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu