> From: Dave Hardy [mailto:dave2020@mindspring.com]
> > > Why screw people who choose a car that they thought was the hot
> > > ticket, and
> > > then proceeded to prove it so? If they did the homework, they
> > SHOULD win.
> > >
> >
> > No one is trying to screw anyone. If that was the desired
> > intent, there are
> > much easier ways to screw lots more people.
>
> Sorry. Poor wording on my part. I know it is nobody's intent to screw
> others, it just looks like that will be the net effect of it.
I meant to say this before but forgot.
All rule changes have a negative impact on somebody. I always keep that in
mind when forming an opinion on value of the change. If you remove an
allowance or raise the classing on a car, its obvious how you impact those
people negatively that have taken advantage of that. But even when you add
an allowance or put a car in a lower class, you impact those that worked
around that old restriction or chose a different car for the class.
So, I always expect to hear someone say, "hey that change will screw me!".
One way or the other. Comes with the territory.
Hopefully, the positive impact on a larger majority will overcome the
negative impact on a relative few.
--Andy
/// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try
/// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
/// Partial archives at http://www.team.net/archive
|