No problem with any of that. What I find goofy about Prepared is that the
rules for EP and CP are completely different rulesets. Not just minor stuff
either, but fundamental differences. It just strikes me as odd.
Dave
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Salem [mailto:eric@mail.brown911.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 3:04 PM
> To: 'Dave Hardy'; awhollis@swbell.net; autox@autox.team.net;
> 'Evolution-Discussions@Yahoogroups. Com'
> Subject: RE: [evolution-disc.] Please comment on the August Fastrack
>
>
> <<
> Agree 100%. Prepared is a great lesson in how NOT to run a category.
> IMO, the prep level should define the category, and the classes within
> that category simply define which cars are equivalent.
> >>
>
> Okay now I gotta jump in here. I run in FP. The car is completely street
> legal and should be an ASP car. The ONLY reason the car is in FP is that
> the parts to build an ASP motor for my '72 911 are no longer available.
> Certainly there are other cars like mine, i.e., all the old british &
> italian cars, that couldn't possibly build an SP legal motor.
>
> So say Prepared has it's problems, which is does. But one of them isn't
> the widely different levels of preperation of the cars. It's restrictive
> rules in SP that preclude us from staying in the class we were in.
>
> Could many of us say we were SP legal and get away with it, certainly,
> but that would be wrong.
>
> e
/// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try
/// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
/// Partial archives at http://www.team.net/archive
|