autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Peru Pro (a bit long-ly overdue)

To: TeamZ3@aol.com
Subject: Re: Peru Pro (a bit long-ly overdue)
From: "Larry R. Metz" <lrmetz@home.com>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 21:17:47 -0500
That was a very good speech, sounds like there is an attorney somewhere
under all those words, maybe crying to get out???

Larry from Indiana, enjoying the dribble

TeamZ3@aol.com wrote:
> 
> mAs awakens........
> 
> Steve, you probably mean well but you just don't understand the entire
> subject.  Since at your own admission you're an attorney I'll forgive your
> inherent nature to argue every immaterial point into the ground.  However,
> unlike in the courtroom, your audience here is not a hand-picked bunch of
> morons and clueless nitwits intended to favor your case, propped up by a
> legal system dominated by self indulgent ex-cronies.  You should at least
> know better than to make a challenge before covering all the opponent's bases.
> 
> You can't just go out Sunday AM and make changes to the course in a Pro Solo
> format.  All the previous runs are based on the original course, and unlike
> solo2, the times from Saturday and Sunday heats are not separate from each
> other.  To make a course deviation would require throwing out all previous
> times and starting over, which those of us who understand the Pro Solo event
> format realize isn't feasible.  While every crooked plaintiff attorney in
> America has a vested financial interest in brainwashing society into
> believing that everything in life is cut and dry, and easily accounted for in
> advance, some of the more intelligent and informed citizens actually know
> better.  It was a tough call with mitigating circumstances, but I believe it
> was the right call regardless of the outcome.  I'm confident that the
> occurence of events will be accounted for in any future Pro Solo events at
> this venue.
> 
> This isn't solo2, it isn't amateur solo; it isn't "make my attorney safety
> weenie wifey feel warm and fuzzy because, even though I have this incessant
> urge to point out that we're both attorneys, we can't possibly afford to
> repair some body damage" solo; this is PRO SOLO (maybe you should consider
> hiring an attorney and divorcing her if she can't accept who you are, or who
> you want to be?).  As most on this digest know, I am very ardent regarding
> safety in a solo2 event because of the nature of the audience it attracts,
> but PRO SOLO is an apple, so don't try to compare it with an orange.  If you
> or anyone else thinks that two cars can line up side by side and race each
> other WOT down a straight and never under any possible circumstance come into
> contact with each other before ever even turning a corner then that's just
> ignorance at it's finest hour.  Just go down to the local dragstrip sometime
> and sooner or later you'll see what I mean.  I have seen bone stock cars
> smash into each other coming off the start line.
> 
> ps: I promise to lay off your profession if you promise to do the same.  It
> might be worth something in your social circle, but around here you're just
> another inexperienced, doesn't know squat rookie who's too ignorant to know
> any better.  In case my point isn't clear, the last thing PRO SOLO needs is
> for a bunch of wienerschnitzels like yourself trying to drag the big dogs (or
> a wannabe medium dog like me :-) onto their rose-colored porch.  If you or
> anyone else doesn't like it then go find your own sandbox to play in.  Nobody
> is forcing you to eat dirt in this one.  Otherwise, come on out and find out
> what a real butt-kicking is all about because you have a long way to go
> before the top of the ladder even comes into your range of vision, let alone
> your reach.
> 
> When the day comes that we hold everyone else responsible for decisions of
> our own free will, it also becomes the day it ceases to exist.  Bet they
> didn't teach you that in law school.
> 
> mAs

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>