buick-rover-v8
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Rover blocks

To: FOSmith@aol.com
Subject: Re: Rover blocks
From: Susan and John Roper <vscjohn@huntnet.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 20:48:07 -0500
Fred, the new heads have a chamber that ccs 28-31.  Just did mine, 29 to 29.5.  
SD1 heads are about 36cc, about 1/2 point compression diff.  New heads have a 
litle biger ports, but less than 10% diff.  Valves are the same size.  John

FOSmith@aol.com wrote:

> Franc Buxton <fab@dcs.warwick.ac.uk> writes:
> In general, what are the specification and feature differences
> > between 3.9 s and 4.0 s?  Are they the same bore and stroke dimensions?
> > This is one little part of the Rover puzzle I would like to learn more
> > about.
>  Hi all, I'm new to this list.  I have a TR8 for which I'v just purchased a 
>'98 Rover 4.0 short block (with cross bolted mains)to replace my 3.5.  I'm now 
>pondering what to do about heads, etc.  My question is this... Besides the 
>deletion of the lower row of holes for the head bolts, what are the 
>differences between the 4.0 and 4.6 heads and the earlier (SD1 type) heads.  
>Is the combustion chamber size the same?  How about the flow characteristics 
>and valve sizes?  Do the 4.0 and 4.6 engines use the same heads?  If the newer 
>heads are a significant improvement I want to try to track down a pair.  If 
>not, I'll just use the heads from my 3.5.  Any information would be greatly 
>appreciated.  Thanks,
>
> Fred Smith
> Orinda, CA
> >         T I A.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Dave Kernberger
> >
>
>     I have just checked with some local Rover contacts of mine, and
> for general information, the difference between 3.9 and 4.0 engines is
> this:
>
>     The 'interim' engine is a 3.9 - actually 3947cc, with some of the
> improvements applied to the 4.6, namely the same 'crossbolter' block, but
> without the crossbolt holes being drilled. It may or may not have main
> bearing caps suitable for crossbolting, some of the earlier ones had old
> pattern caps which did not sit flush with the sides of the housings, so
> nowhere to drill the holes. (I know that bit from experience!) The main
> journals are of the smaller size, despite the common block with the 4.6.
> The 'interim' front cover has the new-design concentric oil pump on the
> crank nose, but has a distributor hole. A worthwhile modification to any
> Rover V8, if you ask me! (see website). This engine came equipped with
> Lucas type 14CUX 'hotwire' fuel injection.
>
>     The '4 litre' engine is the fully-evolved version, distributorless
> and with the large-journal crank. Capacity is the same at 3947cc, as are
> bore (94mm) and stroke (71mm). This one uses the Lucas 'GEMS' engine
> management system.
>
>     Hope this helps/informs!
>
>     Regards,
>         Franc.
>
>     (Have I ever contributed here before, or just lurked? If the latter,
> Hi, guys, interesting reading - keep 'em coming!) F.
> --
>       W------W
>     WW---  ---WW     fab@dcs.warwick.ac.uk
>    W(-(+)^^(+)-)W
>    (|     L    |)    fab@StunnedBuffalo.com
>     \   /WW\   /
>       X\____/X       tel.: +44 (0)705 060 4-FAB
>        XXXXXX             (+44 (0)705 060 4 322)
>         XXXX         http://www.StunnedBuffalo.com
>  >>




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>