Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Spitfire\s+1500\s+year\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Spitfire\s+1500\s+year\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Spitfire 1500 year? (score: 1): Author: Tom Harvey <tom@tomh.demon.co.uk>; Date: Sun, 21 Nov 1999 15:14:33 +0000; I am desperately trying to age my Triumph Spitfire 1500, as the documentation/ID has long been lost by previous owners, and the DVLA seem to think that it is a 1970 Mk3 (!!). I have used various sour; /html/spitfires/1999-11/msg00551.html (8,458 bytes)
2. Re: Spitfire 1500 year? (score: 1): Author: Laura.G@141.com (Laura Gharazeddine); Date: Sun, 21 Nov 1999 07:55:09 -0800; Well this ought to be easy enough! There should be commission plates and such on the car-and those numbers while they won't say "02/02/74" or whatever, do have a definite order and date the car. Ther; /html/spitfires/1999-11/msg00552.html (10,151 bytes)
3. RE: Spitfire 1500 year? (score: 1): Author: "Bowen, Patrick A RP2" <PABowen@sar.med.navy.mil>; Date: Sun, 21 Nov 1999 11:53:28 -0500; To answer your question Tom, yes it should be easy. To add to what Laura said, there is a chassis number (I think that is what it is called) it will be located on the frame outrigger immediately infr; /html/spitfires/1999-11/msg00556.html (11,738 bytes)
4. Re: Spitfire 1500 year? (score: 1): Author: Tom Harvey <tom@tomh.demon.co.uk>; Date: Sun, 21 Nov 1999 16:06:00 +0000; Oops! got me slashes the wrong way. That should of course have been: http://www.tomh.demon.co.uk/spitfire.htm -- Tom Harvey________________________________________________________________ http://www; /html/spitfires/1999-11/msg00557.html (7,560 bytes)
5. Re: Spitfire 1500 year? (score: 1): Author: Tom Harvey <tom@tomh.demon.co.uk>; Date: Sun, 21 Nov 1999 18:22:48 +0000; Sorry... No commission number (except that off of a mk3, hence the DVLA insistence), no chassis number. I should have elaborated, but that is what I meant when I said in my original post that the doc; /html/spitfires/1999-11/msg00560.html (8,256 bytes)
6. Re: Spitfire 1500 year? (score: 1): Author: cecil wise <cwise@southwind.net>; Date: Sun, 21 Nov 1999 16:33:08 -0600; When I restored my '80 Spitfire, I did find a couple of date related items. On the under side of the pad that straddles the drive shaft tunnel (under the hand brake), I found a date, which was a mon; /html/spitfires/1999-11/msg00566.html (8,926 bytes)
7. RE: Spitfire 1500 year? (score: 1): Author: "James Gambony" <BritBits@tiu.net>; Date: Sun, 21 Nov 1999 21:17:32 -0600; Can you crawl under the trunk and see if the frame extends back under the trunk floor pan? Somewhere in the '74-'76 timeframe the US frames "grew" extensions back to tie into the US spec back bumper; /html/spitfires/1999-11/msg00582.html (9,019 bytes)
8. Re: Spitfire 1500 year? (score: 1): Author: Bob Sykes <stan.part@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Sun, 21 Nov 1999 22:22:30 -0800; Hi Tom, I recommend buying or borrowing a copy of John Thomason's "Guide to Originality". It describes in detail the many (but subtle) changes to the UK Spitfires over the years. I can't tell much fr; /html/spitfires/1999-11/msg00583.html (8,600 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]