Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*sp\s+changes\s+in\s+fast\s+track\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*sp\s+changes\s+in\s+fast\s+track\s*$/: 38 ]

Total 38 documents matching your query.

1. sp changes in fast track (score: 1): Author: HPKY59A@prodigy.com ( BENNY DEMENT); Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 09:46:26, -0500; Ok who read the changes in march's fast track? On the fuel system and lines, and extra tanks, ETC. Since volkswagens use an accumulator (Like an Accusump but for fuel) in their system, Does that make; /html/autox/1999-02/msg00959.html (8,092 bytes)
2. Re: sp changes in fast track (score: 1): Author: "Eric Linnhoff" <eric10mm@qni.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 09:15:53 -0600; <snip> == If I read it correctly last night, it looks as though if it already comes stock on the car (from the factory) it will be allowed but not otherwise. Looks like someone's out to get the litt; /html/autox/1999-02/msg00960.html (8,384 bytes)
3. Re: sp changes in fast track (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 10:21:35 -0600; Benny typed: Not having received my copy yet, I'm real curious as to the wording chosen for the changes and the exact section in which the changes reside. Could someone be so kind as to post the spec; /html/autox/1999-02/msg00968.html (7,895 bytes)
4. Re: sp changes in fast track (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 10:30:16 -0700; I found the excessive wording in the restructured rules to be excessive. In addition, if the appeal of the protest found the RX's fuel system legal, then why are the rules being changed to make them; /html/autox/1999-02/msg00977.html (9,613 bytes)
5. Re: sp changes in fast track (score: 1): Author: Brian M Kennedy <kennedy@i2.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 12:32:45 -0600; The rules makers didn't _intend_ to allow the RX fuel system. However, in the protest process, they can't punish people for following the written rules. And they judged that the written rules allowed; /html/autox/1999-02/msg00981.html (9,171 bytes)
6. Re: sp changes in fast track (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 12:52:03 -0600; You and Mark Sipe are apparently, at least in your own minds, omniscient. How in hell can you claim to know the INTENT of the rulesmakers if you didn't participate in the rules-writing process? Well,; /html/autox/1999-02/msg00983.html (9,024 bytes)
7. Re: sp changes in fast track (score: 1): Author: "Eric Linnhoff" <eric10mm@qni.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 13:48:07 -0600; == As one who has already received his copy of Sports Car and read the aforementioned text several times trying to make heads or tails out of it, let me make a comment or two. Apparently there actua; /html/autox/1999-02/msg00987.html (12,404 bytes)
8. Re: sp changes in fast track (score: 1): Author: Jay Mitchell <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 18:55:53 -0800; Obviously, you didn't read the thread on this subject last fall. There have been SP cars using the SAME type of de-embolizing device trophying at Nationals since 1983. The device was ruled legal in w; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01010.html (11,487 bytes)
9. Re: sp changes in fast track (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 10:17:56 -0500 (EST); I don't have the Fasttrack here in from on me, but I seem to recall that they changed most everything I could think of to add another gas tank, including some wording to the effect of "we don't want; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01061.html (11,555 bytes)
10. Re: sp changes in fast track (score: 1): Author: "K.C. Babb" <kcb4286@hps13.iasl.ca.boeing.com>; Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 10:20:57 -0800 (PST); That may have been done, but the authority for doing such a thing really only rests with the SEB. The line between "reasonable" reading of the rules and "tortured interpretation" usually falls in th; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01073.html (11,933 bytes)
11. Re: sp changes in fast track (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 14:50:26 -0600; <quoting me> car that thing really And rightly so. However, there has developed a very serious Catch 22 aspect to rules interpretations. You can write to the SEB requesting a ruling. Even if you send; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01080.html (17,585 bytes)
12. Re: sp changes in fast track (score: 1): Author: "K.C. Babb" <kcb4286@hps13.iasl.ca.boeing.com>; Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 13:53:10 -0800 (PST); Yep; if someone comes up with better/alternative/conflicting information, would you want the SEB to stand by a ruling which in reality permits a configuration which is actually illegal? It's the comp; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01086.html (17,811 bytes)
13. RE: sp changes in fast track (score: 1): Author: "Miller, Don" <MillerD2@idhw.state.id.us>; Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 15:01:58 -0700; Not to throw any fuel on the fire (sorry couldn't help it), but when working with fluids, anything can be a reservoir. I know when flow is measured for natural gas, the diameter of the line is critic; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01087.html (9,682 bytes)
14. Re: sp changes in fast track (score: 1): Author: CCoxx@aol.com; Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 17:36:18 EST; I feel it is time that I chime in on this one. I am the one who invented this particular item that was used in 4 cars that I am aware of at nationals last year. Everyone thinks that the tank in quest; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01091.html (12,205 bytes)
15. Re: sp changes in fast track (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 17:23:41 -0600; Karen responded: <snip> No it doesn't, nor am I arguing for that. I AM saying that, if you see fit to include words like "free," "open," or unrestricted," you should be prepared for people to believe; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01093.html (18,234 bytes)
16. Re: sp changes in fast track (score: 1): Author: "K.C. Babb" <kcb4286@hps13.iasl.ca.boeing.com>; Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 16:04:01 -0800 (PST); That's probably a good point, but how do you allow someone to substitute something in more or less unlimited ways, and yet restrict them to using it for its intended purpose? What filtering action i; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01095.html (13,309 bytes)
17. Re: sp changes in fast track (score: 1): Author: "K.C. Babb" <kcb4286@hps13.iasl.ca.boeing.com>; Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 16:39:42 -0800 (PST); Good technical info, I didn't know that. I'd bet a set of (used) Hoosiers they aren't. SP is generally seen as a perfectly reasonable domain for old, cheap-to-build cars. KCB; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01100.html (8,951 bytes)
18. Re: sp changes in fast track (score: 1): Author: Jay Mitchell <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 20:19:38 -0800; The slippery slope here is "intended purpose." The fuel supply system of a car accomplishes several purposes: 1. Storage of fuel. Mostly in the tank, but also everywhere else in the fuel system. 2. S; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01104.html (13,995 bytes)
19. Re: sp changes in fast track (score: 1): Author: Brian M Kennedy <kennedy@i2.com>; Date: Sat, 20 Feb 1999 02:21:58 -0600; You don't have to be all-knowing -- you can simply talk to the guys involved in the rules-writing process -- they're nice guys and will tell you what their intent was. Exactly. And that's why the pro; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01115.html (9,903 bytes)
20. Re: sp changes in fast track (score: 1): Author: "Scotty *BOB* White" <we2fat4asp@seanet.com>; Date: Sat, 20 Feb 1999 08:20:11 -0800; You only need a tank Chris, just wonderin. Would it work to just run a stock pump submerged in the stock tank and let that pump fuel to the REAL F.I. pump? sbw; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01123.html (8,834 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]