Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jemitchelltx@earthlink.net: 47 ]

Total 47 documents matching your query.

21. Re: PRO/Car and Driver Schedule and Classing available now... (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchelltx@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 15:56:22 -0600
I'm not aware of how he was "spurned," but if the startup performance of PRO a couple years back is any indication, I don't see how anyone could argue that SCCA should have embraced his ideas. So far
/html/autox/2005-02/msg00155.html (9,622 bytes)

22. Re: Exhaust changes for stock class (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchelltx@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 11:21:50 -0600
class? You can replace the muffler and the pipes from the cat back. No. Jay
/html/autox/2004-12/msg00005.html (6,945 bytes)

23. Re: B-Mod Dragon question (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchelltx@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 13:02:06 -0600
That's Tommy Saunders' car. It was originally built by Bill Gendron, starting with a LeGrand chassis . No, it's got a four-cylinder, four-stroke MC engine. I never asked what the donor bike was. If T
/html/autox/2004-11/msg00032.html (7,078 bytes)

24. Re: Buyer Beware! Guy Ankeny & Guy Ankeny Racing (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchelltx@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 12:54:44 -0600
The problem with all this is that you're posting under a pseudonym, but you're accusing a real person of dishonesty. If your complaint is valid, you won't be afraid to let us know who you are and to
/html/autox/2004-11/msg00049.html (8,264 bytes)

25. Re: dirtstockers (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchelltx@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 16:40:17 -0500
approved tires? use shaved Legal (but dumb). They meet all the requirements. Jay
/html/autox/2004-10/msg00060.html (6,751 bytes)

26. Re: 131 SS (elise classing) (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchelltx@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 13:03:12 -0500
fine. That's good to hear. The Elise appears to have an advantage over the C6 Corvette in that regard (at least until Hoosier comes out with 19" sizes). ;<) That's not too big a surprise to me. How m
/html/autox/2004-09/msg00014.html (7,834 bytes)

27. Re: 131 SS (elise classing) (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchelltx@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2004 10:54:32 -0500
optimized for One other item I forgot to ask about: you didn't mention any issues related to no LSD, and you said it's difficult to keep the engine in its powerband. That makes it appear that tractio
/html/autox/2004-09/msg00019.html (8,277 bytes)

28. Re: 131 SS (elise classing) (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchelltx@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2004 15:52:00 -0500
Perhaps because 225 series wants to is in a That doesn't sound that much different from the factory setup in a Series 2 Europa. I guess things haven't changed very much in 35 years. ;<) from my terms
/html/autox/2004-09/msg00035.html (9,553 bytes)

29. Re: 12" to 13" wheel allowance (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchelltx@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 20:52:14 -0500
No, 10s. And Yoko made tires for 'em. =8<0 Jay
/html/autox/2004-08/msg00093.html (7,545 bytes)

30. Re: Fiero upgrade (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchelltx@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 18:03:16 -0500
onto the tower of the early chassis as part of >the upgrade? First, read the Technical Bulletins section of the February Fastrack. Next, determine if the part in question is a "standard factory part"
/html/autox/2004-05/msg00016.html (7,036 bytes)

31. Re: Fiero upgrade, and autocross? (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchelltx@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 21:27:40 -0500
Let's not start down this road ("SCCA discriminates against MY car and helps out everybody else") again. It leads nowhere. The rules are the rules. Allowed modifications apply equally to _all_ cars i
/html/autox/2004-05/msg00104.html (9,611 bytes)

32. Re: Fiero upgrade, new GTO - hmmm - Pontiacs and autocross? (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchelltx@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 21:40:19 -0500
supension form a STOCK You're leaving something out here. Did your proposal involve cutting and/or welding? If so, that's specifically prohibited by the U/B rule. If not, it's legal in SP already. an
/html/autox/2004-05/msg00106.html (10,041 bytes)

33. Re: Fiero upgrade, and autocross? (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchelltx@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 09:55:47 -0500
Not at all. person who You're conveniently missing the point. The decision about U/B was based on the fact that competitors were complaining about it, NOT on the U/B possibilities for a single car. T
/html/autox/2004-05/msg00114.html (9,867 bytes)

34. Re: Fiero upgrade, and autocross? (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchelltx@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 11:27:49 -0500
<snip> No, that would be me, not Mark. the STAC recommended the change. So, you're saying that competitors did NOT whine about it? You must not have been reading the Street Touring mailing list, then
/html/autox/2004-05/msg00118.html (11,212 bytes)

35. Re: U/B in ST (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchelltx@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 13:10:43 -0500
With what sort of results, might I ask? ;<) "Kills SCCA in the market place?" What world are you living in? I see entry caps on more and more events and record attendance levels overall year after ye
/html/autox/2004-05/msg00139.html (8,834 bytes)

36. Re: U/B in ST (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchelltx@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 12:57:54 -0500
competitive SP cars are That's not a question, it's an assertion. I'd say it's probably true, but that it is entirely irrelevant to this discussion. away from from the >concept of Streetable SP and s
/html/autox/2004-05/msg00143.html (12,311 bytes)

37. Re: U/B in ST (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchelltx@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 19:43:46 -0500
UB/BD) in OK, I just went back to my Solo II rulebooks for some history, to see if I could come up with some idea of the "original concept" of ST. Street Touring first appeared in the 1998 rulebook (
/html/autox/2004-05/msg00147.html (10,758 bytes)

38. Re: U/B in ST (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchelltx@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 21:08:13 -0500
believe there I presume you mean Civic DX models with Si drivelines. The vehicle population that would be adversely affected by the rule change is potentially much larger than that. Can you say with
/html/autox/2004-05/msg00149.html (8,453 bytes)

39. Re: U/B in ST (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchelltx@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 13:15:58 -0500
frankly folks, I have read this section many times. I have discussed the issue with SP competitors who have written the SEB for clarification of this allowance. Your reading is directly at odds with
/html/autox/2004-05/msg00157.html (11,640 bytes)

40. Re: U/B in ST (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchelltx@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 07:33:01 -0500
part? in an No. You are confusing two things: repair, which is legal in Stock, and upgrade under update/backdate, which is only legal under given restrictions. "in the at point paint to You can legal
/html/autox/2004-05/msg00162.html (8,383 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]
This search system is powered by Namazu