Thom Kuby wrote:
Sounds like what the vintage community needs is a unified voice
> (somehow, somewhere) that would act as a disinterested third party that
> would bring problems like this out into the open-or does all this sound too
> I dunno, I'm just as confused as everybody else on this one...I know this
> is frustrating for everybody, but I can't help but think that if people
> (like this tech inspector mentioned above) are generally allowed to
> slide... then the situation will only get worse. The "secret handshake"
> mentality that Thompson brings up needs to be publicized, brought into the
This is what VMC was formed in theory to do but... the individual clubs
don't want to give-up any of their 'authority' and that's where so many of
the issues we've all been tossing around the past months stem from.
Club x allows this, club y allows that and everyone gets pissed off calling
this group a bunch of conservative s.o.b.s and that a bunch of nouveau
vintage racers who just don't get it.
Maybe we need to push a little harder to get some standardization
Mike
|