--===============8725761828049907950==
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
------UP8B7RC7STEKCYJ82IS5NZIAZQXUTU
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Actually there is a reasonable explanation=2E
The heavier springs are also longer than the old ones, so the tension as i=
nstalled is lower=2E
-- Randall
On 2 March 2020 14:45:07 GMT-06:00, Paul Tegler <ptegler@verizon=2Enet> wr=
ote:
>Having studied this over and over again, even have gone as far as=20
>redesigning the whole timing system (during a F=2EI and full wasted spark
>
>conversion)=C3=AF=C2=BF=C2=BD =2E=2E=2E and with simple physics behind me=
I can comfortably
>say=20
>your empirical data has to be flawed=2E=2E=2E=2Eno nice way to say it=2E
>
>simple physics=2E=2E=2E=2E a tighter (stronger) spring will not extend as=
far
>as=20
>a lighter spring under the same weight applied=2E
>
>Either you jostled something in the initial setup/study, or your post=20
>spring work setup shifted something, throwing one of the two data sets=20
>out as a valid data reference=2E
>
>Either way,,,,this is possibly a mute point if it is now all working
>for=20
>you as expected=2E=C3=AF=C2=BF=C2=BD :-)
>
>ptegler
>
>
>On 3/2/2020 2:15 PM, Peter Arakelian wrote:
>
>> >> A stiffer spring would have not allowed the weights to swing out
>as=20
>> far
>> at lower rpms=2E It would NOT ADD idle advance over the original
>> settings=2E<<
>>
>> I admit that I believed the stronger springs would reduce centripetal
>
>> advance at idle =2E=C3=AF=C2=BF=C2=BD But the empirical evidence shows =
otherwise=2E=C3=AF=C2=BF=C2=BD
>When I=20
>> put the
>>
>> stiffer springs in the timing at idle ADVANCED 10-15 degrees=2E=C3=AF=
=C2=BF=C2=BD It
>is=20
>> very stable=2E
>>
>> Sent from Mail <https://go=2Emicrosoft=2Ecom/fwlink/?LinkId=3D550986> f=
or=20
>> Windows 10
>>
>--=20
>Paul Tegler
>ptegler@verizon=2Enet www=2Eteglerizer=2Ecom
------UP8B7RC7STEKCYJ82IS5NZIAZQXUTU
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html><head>
<meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html;
charset=3Dwindows-1252">
</head>
<body text=3D"#000000" bgcolor=3D"#FFFFFF">Actually there is a reasonabl=
e explanation=2E<br>The heavier springs are also longer than the old ones, =
so the tension as installed is lower=2E<br><br>-- Randall<br><br><div class=
=3D"gmail_quote">On 2 March 2020 14:45:07 GMT-06:00, Paul Tegler <ptegle=
r@verizon=2Enet> wrote:<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin=
: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0=2E8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-l=
eft: 1ex;">
<p>Having studied this over and over again, even have gone as far as
redesigning the whole timing system (during a F=2EI and full wasted
spark conversion)=C3=AF=C2=BF=C2=BD =2E=2E=2E and with simple physic=
s behind me I can
comfortably say your empirical data has to be flawed=2E=2E=2E=2Eno n=
ice
way to say it=2E</p>
<p>simple physics=2E=2E=2E=2E a tighter (stronger) spring will not ext=
end as
far as a lighter spring under the same weight applied=2E <br>
</p>
<p>Either you jostled something in the initial setup/study, or your
post spring work setup shifted something, throwing one of the two
data sets out as a valid data reference=2E</p>
<p>Either way,,,,this is possibly a mute point if it is now all
working for you as expected=2E=C3=AF=C2=BF=C2=BD :-)</p>
<p>ptegler<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>On 3/2/2020 2:15 PM, Peter Arakelian wrote:<br>
</p>
<blockquote type=3D"cite" cite=3D"mid:DM5PR06MB35646DCD45558C7435F6FB1=
2C1E70@DM5PR06MB3564=2Enamprd06=2Eprod=2Eoutlook=2Ecom">
<meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html;
charset=3Dwindows-1252">
<meta name=3D"Generator" content=3D"Microsoft Word 15 (filtered
medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p=2EMsoNormal, li=2EMsoNormal, div=2EMsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:=2E0001pt;
font-size:11=2E0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span=2EMsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8=2E5in 11=2E0in;
margin:1=2E0in 1=2E0in 1=2E0in 1=2E0in;}
div=2EWordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style>
<div class=3D"WordSection1">
<p class=3D"MsoNormal">>> A stiffer spring would have not
allowed the weights to swing out as far
<br>
at lower rpms=2E It would NOT ADD idle advance over the original
<br>
settings=2E<<</p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><o:p>=C3=AF=C2=BF=C2=BD</o:p></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal">I admit that I believed the stronger
springs would reduce centripetal advance at idle =2E=C3=AF=C2=BF=
=C2=BD But the
empirical evidence shows otherwise=2E=C3=AF=C2=BF=C2=BD When I p=
ut the
</p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal">stiffer springs in the timing at idle
ADVANCED 10-15 degrees=2E=C3=AF=C2=BF=C2=BD It is very stable=2E
</p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><o:p>=C3=AF=C2=BF=C2=BD</o:p></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal">Sent from <a href=3D"https://go=2Emicrosoft=
=2Ecom/fwlink/?LinkId=3D550986" moz-do-not-send=3D"true">
Mail</a> for Windows 10</p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><o:p>=C3=AF=C2=BF=C2=BD</o:p></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<pre class=3D"moz-signature" cols=3D"72">--=20
Paul Tegler
<a class=3D"moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href=3D"mailto:ptegler@verizon=2Enet=
">ptegler@verizon=2Enet</a> <a class=3D"moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href=3D"=
http://www=2Eteglerizer=2Ecom";>www=2Eteglerizer=2Ecom</a></pre>
=20
</blockquote></div></body></html>
------UP8B7RC7STEKCYJ82IS5NZIAZQXUTU--
--===============8725761828049907950==
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
** triumphs@autox.team.net **
Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/triumphs http://www.team.net/archive
--===============8725761828049907950==--
|