This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--===============2860095162433883696==
boundary="------------B3304B3D4DABA16C1911AE7B"
Content-Language: en-US
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------B3304B3D4DABA16C1911AE7B
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
you've got some other issue going on.
A stiffer spring would have not allowed the weights to swing out as far
at lower rpms. It would NOT ADD idle advance over the original
settings.�� If anything...your original timing setting might have been
now retarded as the new springs would have held the weights in longer up
the rpm band, and possible at idle� (new springs= no/less centripetal
advance at idle).
If your timing is bouncing around or erractic...have to bothered to
check the end float of your cam driven dist drive gear?� IIRC, something
like 0.04" of uncontrolled float can create +/- 5 degrees of timing
jitter.� You stack (or remove) shims under the dist pedistal to correct
the end float.
ptegler
On 3/1/2020 2:39 PM, Peter Arakelian wrote:
>
> > Wouldn't stiffer springs give you less advance at idle and, hence,
> more advance at speed?<
>
> That was my initial thought, too.� However, the way the system appears
> to work is that the weights pull out no matter which spring is used.�
> The springs determine how much of that pull is transferred to the
> distributor�s advance.�� A stiffer spring will follow the pull of the
> weight more closely giving you advance sooner.� This was also borne
> out by what actually occurred. When I put the stiffer springs in the
> idle timing advanced by 10-15 degrees.
>
> Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for
> Windows 10
>
>
> ** triumphs@autox.team.net **
>
> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
> Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/triumphs http://www.team.net/archive
>
> Unsubscribe/Manage:
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/triumphs/ptegler@verizon.net
--
Paul Tegler
ptegler@verizon.net www.teglerizer.com
--------------B3304B3D4DABA16C1911AE7B
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p>you've got some other issue going on.</p>
<p>A stiffer spring would have not allowed the weights to swing out
as far at lower rpms. It would NOT ADD idle advance over the
original settings.�� If anything...your original timing setting
might have been now retarded as the new springs would have held
the weights in longer up the rpm band, and possible at idle� (new
springs= no/less centripetal advance at idle).</p>
<p>If your timing is bouncing around or erractic...have to bothered
to check the end float of your cam driven dist drive gear?� IIRC,
something like 0.04" of uncontrolled float can create +/- 5
degrees of timing jitter.� You stack (or remove) shims under the
dist pedistal to correct the end float.</p>
<p>ptegler<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 3/1/2020 2:39 PM, Peter Arakelian
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:DM5PR06MB35643449E1BC7372031CF5C9C1E60@DM5PR06MB3564.namprd06.prod.outlook.com">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered
medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style>
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">> Wouldn't stiffer springs give you less
advance at idle and, hence, more advance at speed?<<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p>�</o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">That was my initial thought, too.� However,
the way the system appears to work is that the weights pull
out no matter which spring is used.� The springs determine how
much of that pull is transferred to the distributor�s
advance.�� A stiffer spring will follow the pull of the weight
more closely giving you advance sooner.� This was also borne
out by what actually occurred. When I put the stiffer springs
in the idle timing advanced by 10-15 degrees.<br>
<br>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p>�</o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Sent from <a
href="https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986";
moz-do-not-send="true">
Mail</a> for Windows 10</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p>�</o:p></p>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">** <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:triumphs@autox.team.net";>triumphs@autox.team.net</a> **
Archive: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.team.net/pipermail/triumphs";>http://www.team.net/pipermail/triumphs</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.team.net/archive";>http://www.team.net/archive</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Paul Tegler
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:ptegler@verizon.net";>ptegler@verizon.net</a> <a
class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="http://www.teglerizer.com";>www.teglerizer.com</a></pre>
</body>
</html>
--------------B3304B3D4DABA16C1911AE7B--
--===============2860095162433883696==
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
** triumphs@autox.team.net **
Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/triumphs http://www.team.net/archive
--===============2860095162433883696==--
|