triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TR] distributor advance

To: Peter Arakelian <PeterAra@msn.com>, "triumphs@autox.team.net" <triumphs@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: [TR] distributor advance
From: Paul Tegler <ptegler@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 15:45:07 -0500
Delivered-to: mharc@autox.team.net
Delivered-to: triumphs@autox.team.net
References: <DM5PR06MB35646DCD45558C7435F6FB12C1E70@DM5PR06MB3564.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--===============0251571120893971243==
 boundary="------------EF759FA0426DD8E7F3D8C2D5"
Content-Language: en-US

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------EF759FA0426DD8E7F3D8C2D5
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Having studied this over and over again, even have gone as far as 
redesigning the whole timing system (during a F.I and full wasted spark 
conversion)� ... and with simple physics behind me I can comfortably say 
your empirical data has to be flawed....no nice way to say it.

simple physics.... a tighter (stronger) spring will not extend as far as 
a lighter spring under the same weight applied.

Either you jostled something in the initial setup/study, or your post 
spring work setup shifted something, throwing one of the two data sets 
out as a valid data reference.

Either way,,,,this is possibly a mute point if it is now all working for 
you as expected.� :-)

ptegler


On 3/2/2020 2:15 PM, Peter Arakelian wrote:

> >> A stiffer spring would have not allowed the weights to swing out as 
> far
> at lower rpms. It would NOT ADD idle advance over the original
> settings.<<
>
> I admit that I believed the stronger springs would reduce centripetal 
> advance at idle .� But the empirical evidence shows otherwise.� When I 
> put the
>
> stiffer springs in the timing at idle ADVANCED 10-15 degrees.� It is 
> very stable.
>
> Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for 
> Windows 10
>
-- 
Paul Tegler
ptegler@verizon.net  www.teglerizer.com


--------------EF759FA0426DD8E7F3D8C2D5
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
      charset=windows-1252">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <p>Having studied this over and over again, even have gone as far as
      redesigning the whole timing system (during a F.I and full wasted
      spark conversion)� ... and with simple physics behind me I can
      comfortably say your empirical data has to be flawed....no nice
      way to say it.</p>
    <p>simple physics.... a tighter (stronger) spring will not extend as
      far as a lighter spring under the same weight applied. <br>
    </p>
    <p>Either you jostled something in the initial setup/study, or your
      post spring work setup shifted something, throwing one of the two
      data sets out as a valid data reference.</p>
    <p>Either way,,,,this is possibly a mute point if it is now all
      working for you as expected.� :-)</p>
    <p>ptegler<br>
    </p>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <p>On 3/2/2020 2:15 PM, Peter Arakelian wrote:<br>
    </p>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:DM5PR06MB35646DCD45558C7435F6FB12C1E70@DM5PR06MB3564.namprd06.prod.outlook.com">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
        charset=windows-1252">
      <meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered
        medium)">
      <style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
        {font-family:"Cambria Math";
        panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Calibri;
        panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0in;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:11.0pt;
        font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline;}
MsoChpDefault
        {mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page WordSection1
        {size:8.5in 11.0in;
        margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
        {page:WordSection1;}
--></style>
      <div class="WordSection1">
        <p class="MsoNormal">&gt;&gt; A stiffer spring would have not
          allowed the weights to swing out as far
          <br>
          at lower rpms. It would NOT ADD idle advance over the original
          <br>
          settings.&lt;&lt;</p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p>�</o:p></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal">I admit that I believed the stronger
          springs would reduce centripetal advance at idle .� But the
          empirical evidence shows otherwise.� When I put the
        </p>
        <p class="MsoNormal">stiffer springs in the timing at idle
          ADVANCED 10-15 degrees.� It is very stable.
        </p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p>�</o:p></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal">Sent from <a
            href="https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986";
            moz-do-not-send="true">
            Mail</a> for Windows 10</p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p>�</o:p></p>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
Paul Tegler
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" 
href="mailto:ptegler@verizon.net";>ptegler@verizon.net</a>  <a 
class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" 
href="http://www.teglerizer.com";>www.teglerizer.com</a></pre>
  </body>
</html>

--------------EF759FA0426DD8E7F3D8C2D5--

--===============0251571120893971243==
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

** triumphs@autox.team.net **

Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/triumphs  http://www.team.net/archive


--===============0251571120893971243==--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>