triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: tail lights

To: Big Triumph List <triumphs@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: tail lights
From: Jim Barbuscia <jimbar@centurytel.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 10:00:12 -0800
References: <NOEDJDCNFBCNELMBFNFEMEBCGIAA.Ryoung@navcomtech.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
Randall Young wrote:

>See
>http://www.buckeyetriumphs.org/technical/Electrical/TR6Sockets/TR6Sockets.ht
>m
>for a fruitful approach to repairing them.  I did something very similar,
>except I used a small piece of copper braid to bridge the gap.
>
I tried that but found it to be an effort in futility, after melting 
sockets (I'm really bad at soldering) 36
bucks for a new complete set of 6 looked like a really good idea.

>BTW, new sockets are available from TRF, et al.  However, the new sockets
>(at least the ones I got) require a ground wire that was not originally
>present.  IMO using the sockets that take a ground wire (and adding the
>wire) is a good idea ... the ground through the clip and housing is less
>certain and can cause dim(er) tail/brake lights.
>
I'll let you know how mine are when they arrive.

>Also BTW, using 2357 bulbs rather than the usual 1157 will give you brighter
>brake lights.  They only draw 5% more current, so that shouldn't be a
>concern, but they do have somewhat shorter life than the 1157 bulbs (rated
>400 hours on the turn/brake filament, versus 1200 for the 1157).  An
>excellent trade-off, IMO.
>
I hear ya on this one. That's what I'm going to do.

>
>Randall-jimb
>
>  
>
-jimb
'76 TR6 CF53980UO
http://home.centurytel.net/~jimbar





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>