triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Triumphs vs. MGs...whatsa scoop?

Subject: Re: Triumphs vs. MGs...whatsa scoop?
From: Randall <randallyoung@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 1999 08:47:02 -0700
Cc: Triumph list <triumphs@autox.team.net>
References: <000B302B59E0D111BC8800AA00B7B1681F883E@exchange.keystonesystems.com>
Mark :

Your thoughtful piece brought an old question to mind :
When you are driving the MGA, does anyone ever ask you "Is that a
Triumph" ? <g>

Randall
59 TR3A

MPRICE@KeystoneSystems.com wrote:
> 
> Ken
> I won't try to speak for others. I love the Triumphs. Someday, budgets and
> kids permitting I'll get my TR3, and GT6. (My son wants a spit.)Meanwhile
> I'll work on the one model I really love. TR250s. But I must admit, I do own
> an MG too. A 1958 MGA... made back when they had real frames and a classic
> roadster body style. Its not fast or powerful, but it is fun to drive (big
> criteria) and IMHO a beautiful car to look at. I don't like the MGBs or
> others that followed. Even if they put V8s in. I think they are too
> ubiquitous.
> 
> Both Marques are subject to rust, but I think that with the Triumphs, with a
> separate frame, someone like me can have a reasonable chance of restoring a
> car.
> 
> But, like everything else, we have our own preferences for any one of a
> number of different reasons. If you're looking for power you can find all
> kinds of ways to put more ponys to the wheels. Regardless of what kind of
> car you do it to. If you're looking for something fun and unique, something
> that will turn heads, something your kids want you to will to them
> (yeah....like that's going to happen) you can't go wrong with a Triumph. And
> yes, I think the average Triumph has enough power for what I want to
> do.....so far. (Wait a year or two.)
> 
> But welcome...
> Mark

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>