OK, OK!
Seems like there's a whole lot of us with little to do.
So, assuming a leadership role here.... (hah! Isn't that a joke?)...
let's steer this discussion back to some racing...
Comments please on the following...please title your comments in the
subject line so we can track responses....
Annual tech...
While I really like this idea, what's to stop a guy who has an annual
tech, then races in some other organizations event, totals his car,
rebuilds it, then attends a VSCDA event, and because of his annual tech,
doesn't get his car looked at??? What reporting takes place in our sport
regarding incidents? Why aren't 13/13 rulings published? (I've got a
good idea...) What exactly does the VMC do? Would they also be
responsible for disseminating tech information?
Race Reports...
Not that any of us care about winning...
I CARE!
I CARE!
I CARE!
I CARE!
I CARE!
I CARE!
Sorry... the truth key was stuck on my computer there for a moment...
but doesn't it piss you off just a little when race reports only deal
with Group winners as opposed to class winners? Forget winning... how
about just some heroic dices that took place thoughout the course of a
race that was far more interesting than what was going on up front? I
know that it's difficult due to the size of some of the tracks, and the
fact the reporters work for free or next to free. But how often have you
been interviewed after a race?
Does everyone agree that after Jon F. was involved in an incident at
IRP (that by all accounts was his fault) that all of of sudden, he
became very visible, looking for buddies to congratulate, encourage,
slap on the back etc? Do rules apply to everyone? This is the biggest
thing that pisses me off about our sport.
You may now resort to your perviously posted material.
WST
Flounder
|