spitfires
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Starter spacers vs. shims

To: William Davies <bill@rarebits4classics.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Starter spacers vs. shims
From: Joe Curry <Spitlist@gte.net>
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2002 13:28:39 -0700
Bill,
The later Spits have nuts and bolts too!

Joe

William Davies wrote:
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Nolan Penney <npenney@mde.state.md.us>
> 
> > Some engines mount the starter with nuts and bolts, not studs or
> > threaded holes.  These types of mounts are inherently sloppy.  With
> > these, you do use shims to properly space the starter motor in
> > relationship to the flywheel.
> > The Spitfire has its starter mounted in a much more precise manner,
> > eliminating the need for shims.
> 
> All of my Spitfires (and Heralds, 2000s, Dolomites etc) have been fitted with 
>nuts and bolts. I can't speak for the last 1500s, but the similarly engined 
>Dolomites of that era also had starters fitted by nuts and bolts,
>     Cheers,
>         Bill.

///  spitfires@autox.team.net mailing list
///  or try  http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>