To: | "'MICHAEL C ROSS'" <mikeross@prodigy.net>, <spitfires@autox.team.net>, |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: prop/drive shaft |
From: | <ralemen@cableone.net> |
Date: | Wed, 12 Jun 2002 08:11:26 -0700 |
Here's my thoughts: Original or rebalanced shafts are balanced off the car. Flanges are symmetrical. If the shaft is balanced it should not matter on which bolt holes align given the two previous statements. I have never heard of any special procedure to align in the original manufacture on the car. Equally if a shaft is out of balance it also should not matter as the results would be the same. Not sure how a shft can go out of balance unless it gets distorted ( bent) as it gets no wear apart from at the joints. There is some amount of play in aligning the bolt holes on the flanges. I always try to make sure that each flange is centralised on the other. If the flanges are off centre then the shaft is off centre thus will appear out of blance. The U joint naturally takes care of the positional shift but not the balance. I have always made sure my flanges or any other rotating mating parts are centralised on each other. I admit I never marked one end of my driveshaft. But I made sure it was centralised before tightening the bolts. I never had any problem like Mike. So marking the flanges althought the quoted way of doing it may not actually do any more than give you piece of mind. Now if someone has some some concrete information ( and I mean the physics) then I would love to hear it. Alan |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: prop/drive shaft, Craig Smith |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: prop/drive shaft, MICHAEL C ROSS |
Previous by Thread: | RE: prop/drive shaft, Craig Smith |
Next by Thread: | Re: prop/drive shaft, MICHAEL C ROSS |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |