spitfires
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: seatbelts

To: "List Spitfires" <spitfires@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: seatbelts
From: "Graham Stretch" <technical@iwnet.screaming.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 23:36:57 -0000
Ok What do "you" have to do to go to traffic school, it's quite hard to get
a place over here! Never been to traffic school don't know how I missed out
on that especially in my youth!

 Graham.

----- Original Message -----
From: Banbury, Terrence <Terrence.Banbury@dnr.state.oh.us>
To: Fred Thomas <vafred@erols.com>; 'Joe Curry' <spitlist@gte.net>
Cc: <spitfires@autox.team.net>
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2000 5:10 PM
Subject: RE: seatbelts


>
> I went to traffic school recently myself.  Oops.  It was informative, but
I
> plan on not going again.
> Terry
>
> > ----------
> > From: Joe Curry[SMTP:spitlist@gte.net]
> > Reply To: Joe Curry
> > Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2000 8:39 PM
> > To: Fred Thomas
> > Cc: spitfires@autox.team.net
> > Subject: Re: seatbelts
> >
> >
> > Having just attended Traffic school (don't ask), I can say that in
> > Arizona, cars older than 1972 are not required to have seatbelts.  The
> > reason given is that was the first year that belts were required by
> > law.  I thought it was earlier than that!
> >
> > Joe
> >
> > Fred Thomas wrote:
> > >
> > > June, 1964, seat belts became mandatory standard equipment, the first
> > year
> > > or 2, they were not mandatory for the rear seats, even though most
> > companys
> > > did install them.   "FT"
> >
> > --
> > "If you can't excel with talent, triumph with effort."
> >  -- Dave Weinbaum in National Enquirer
> >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>