James,
I wasn't of the mind to DQ WRGs either, until this event. Some folks are
abusing the system, in my mind.
As for the course and the efficiency of the event, you and MJ did a
great job!
--Pat K
----------
>From: "james creasy" <james@thevenom.net>
>To: "Pat Kelly" <lollipop487@attbi.com>, "Boris Elpiner" <boris@elpiner.net>,
"'john f. kelly jr.'" <76067.1750@compuserve.com>, "'bay area team.net'"
<ba-autox@autox.team.net>
>Subject: Re: WRG (was Round 4 results)
>Date: Wed, Nov 6, 2002, 11:19 AM
>
> im not so keen on essentially DQing people for WRG. for one thing, some
> people would have lots of choices (stock) and others (prep, mod, and OSP)
> would have fewer. since there are fair fewer mod and prep people than
> stock, you wont be making that much of a difference, while differentially
> punishing drivers in classes that are already thinly attended.
>
> i could have done a better job of making sure the positions were filled
> before the run groups, but since we did have over 200 entries plus morning
> and afternoon fun runs, a 10AM start and picked up before the sun set, i
> dont think its a catastrophic problem.
>
> some suggested combining the afternoon run groups to me, but actually it
> might save less time.. as long as a car is always running on course, we are
> at maximum capacity. having two run groups in the PM leaves dead time for
> changeover. getting people to show up for working is the thing that holds
> up the event, wandering around the paddock looking for the card sorter or
> starter is the most frustrating aspect of chairing i find. listening to the
> griping about a nearly perfect course is the second! :-)
>
> -james
> OSP - Our Serpent's Paradise
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Pat Kelly" <lollipop487@attbi.com>
>> Hi Boris,
>> After I read his message, I told him that many drivers have such a choice
> as
>> you do...personally, we're restricted to either a Prepared class, or D
>> Modified. And I agree with you.
>> But what about eliminating the ability of folks running in the WRG? At
> least
>> require that they select a real class and run in the correct group? That
>> would maybe eliminate the F Stock fiasco (or C Stock, for that matter)
> that
>> happened Sunday. If they don't run in the correct group, they are
>> automatically disqualified (i.e., no times listed, placed at the end of
> the
>> class). Not draconian in the scheme of things, but it might help keep the
>> work/run groups more even, and the events run more smoothly, and be more
> fun
>> to chair.
>> --Pat K
>>
>> ----------
>> >From: "Boris Elpiner" <boris@elpiner.net>
>> >To: "'John F. Kelly Jr.'" <76067.1750@compuserve.com>, "'bay area
> team.net'"
>> <ba-autox@autox.team.net>, "'Pat Kelly'" <lollipop487@attbi.com>
>> >Subject: RE: WRG (was Round 4 results)
>> >Date: Wed, Nov 6, 2002, 10:10 AM
>> >
>>
>> > John,
>> >
>> > I don't think you can effectively control this situation. There are many
>> > classes where a car can be legally entered. For example I can run my BS
>> > car in ASP, SM2, OSP, EM or ST (street tires). I'm guilty of running
>> > outside of my regular class for the first 3 Slush events. But that was
>> > the only way for me to participate in those events.
>> >
>> > Maybe we should reevaluate going back to 4/2 run group schedule for the
>> > Slush to resolve workers situation. Fun runs would be an added benefit
>> > for running in the afternoon.
>> >
>> > Boris.
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: owner-ba-autox@autox.team.net
>> > [mailto:owner-ba-autox@autox.team.net] On Behalf Of John F. Kelly Jr.
>> > Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 8:56 AM
>> > To: bay area team.net; Pat Kelly
>> > Subject: Round 4 results
>> >
>> > -------------------- Begin Original Message --------------------
>> >
>> > Message text written by "Pat Kelly"
>> >
>> > " There were 202 separate entries, too many Wrong Run Groups (all of
>> > F
>> > Stock, for instance)."
>> >
>> > -------------------- End Original Message --------------------
>> >
>> > Wrong Run Groups. This situation is screwing up our event operations.
>> > For
>> > many, many events, we have seen the first run group over run with
>> > entries
>> > and then the afternoon groups have a worker shortage.
>> > This is especially intriguing during the last two events, for
>> > example. The last run group at our previous event was pretty small and
>> > this
>> > group ran first this past Sunday and was quite full. The purpose of run
>> > groups is to even out things so every group has a similar number of
>> > entrants throughout the day. It isn't working.
>> > Now most event chairs are more than willing to take care of some
>> > individual's time situation. But if this keeps up we may have to not
>> > allow
>> > you to run if your class isn't the one listed for the group on the grid.
>> > Everybody's cooperation is needed to make our events an ongoing
>> > pleasure.
>> >
>> > --John Kelly
|