To: | "'Steven T. Ekstrand'" <cyberlaw@earthlink.net>, |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: [evolution-disc.] Re: Potential new helmet rule would |
From: | "Eric Salem" <ebsalem1@cox.net> |
Date: | Thu, 18 Nov 2004 10:38:36 -0600 |
Whatever we think may be immaterial. The SCCA probably knew this would upset some apple-carts. The Area Directors certainly did. Insurers of motorsport sanctions all over the world are have harder times buying re-insurance. Maybe logic be damned, this is driven by insurance and thus those with Airbagged cars are just stuck with it? We can be as correct and indignant as we want but, it is pretty hard to have a SoloII without insurance. (And yes, like many of you I will now have to have different helmets for my cars.) e #72 FP Or the Airbagged MazdaSpeed |
Previous by Date: | Re: Potential new helmet rule would affect autocrossers, Mark Andy |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [evolution-disc.] Re: Potential new helmet rule would, Matt Murray |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [evolution-disc.] Re: Potential new helmet rule would, Haden, Bruce |
Next by Thread: | Re: [evolution-disc.] Re: Potential new helmet rule would, Matt Murray |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |