autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [evolution-disc.] Re: Potential new helmet rule would

To: Matt Murray <mattm@optonline.net>
Subject: Re: [evolution-disc.] Re: Potential new helmet rule would
From: Kevin Stevens <autox@pursued-with.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 17:53:11 -0800
On Nov 17, 2004, at 17:46, Matt Murray wrote:

> All true, but the fact remains that a supplemental restrain
> System (SRS) or "airbag" delivers a tremendous amount of energy
> in a small area. My guess is that the SRS will break that part of
> the helmet and force it towards your jaw.

I'm sorry, but I can't believe this for a minute.  I absolutely do not 
believe that an airbag deployment can break the chin protector of a 
full-face helmet under any imaginable circumstances.  I've destroyed 
helmets with sledgehammers - it's a very good workout.

My assumption, which I freely admit may be wrong somehow, is that they 
are saying the airbag forces the chin protector element into the jaw 
hard enough to break it (basically rotating the helmet forward on your 
head).  My previous comments apply to that scenario.

KeS






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>