autox
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [evolution-disc.] Re: Potential new helmet rule would

To: Matt Murray <mattm@optonline.net>
Subject: RE: [evolution-disc.] Re: Potential new helmet rule would
From: "Madurski, Ronald M" <ronald.m.madurski@lmco.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 10:51:17 -0500
Or maybe the chin strap is making contact with the bottom of the jaw?

Ron Madurski

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-autox@autox.team.net [mailto:owner-autox@autox.team.net]On
> Behalf Of Kevin Stevens
> Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 8:53 PM
> To: Matt Murray
> Cc: NER; evolution-discussions; .Team.Net; NER Solo postings
> Subject: Re: [evolution-disc.] Re: Potential new helmet rule would
> affect autocrossers
> 
> 
> On Nov 17, 2004, at 17:46, Matt Murray wrote:
> 
> > All true, but the fact remains that a supplemental restrain
> > System (SRS) or "airbag" delivers a tremendous amount of energy
> > in a small area. My guess is that the SRS will break that part of
> > the helmet and force it towards your jaw.
> 
> I'm sorry, but I can't believe this for a minute.  I 
> absolutely do not 
> believe that an airbag deployment can break the chin protector of a 
> full-face helmet under any imaginable circumstances.  I've destroyed 
> helmets with sledgehammers - it's a very good workout.
> 
> My assumption, which I freely admit may be wrong somehow, is 
> that they 
> are saying the airbag forces the chin protector element into the jaw 
> hard enough to break it (basically rotating the helmet 
> forward on your 
> head).  My previous comments apply to that scenario.
> 
> KeS






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>