Re: U/B in ST

[Smokerbros@aol.com]

In a message dated 5/13/04 6:28:50 AM Pacific Daylight Time, bthatch@juno.com 
writes:


> No, the original "vision" for ST in the original rules was clear. ST was
> to be similar to SP to allow U/B of components between cars. This was a
> good rule, IMO. 

Interesting that the STAC was not (during our discussions about UB/BD) in 
complete agreement that this was the original concept...

   But the class rose up when someone actually built their
> car to the rules, taking advantage of every aspect of the rules, and so
> 

The concept that UB/BD was possibly going to go away was out to the members 
before at least one of those cars was built.  

Charlie