Excellent point...Maybe GH can shed some light on this. My impression is that
the M3 and maybe a couple others got lumped together in this paragraph but were
specifically mentioned elsewhere.
Except....I looked through all my back info and minutes and found nothing other
than what you have provided.
Hmmmmmm. maybe the keg hit MY head!
AB
Bradley Lamont <lamont@mailhost.org> on 08/15/2000 11:15:41 AM
Please respond to Bradley Lamont <lamont@mailhost.org>
To: autox@autox.team.net
cc: (bcc: Andrew Bettencourt/FIELD SALES/Kingston)
Subject: Re: new classifications
At 09:54 AM 8/15/00, Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com said:
>Yup, you sure did. The new stock class reorg is targeted for 2001
>implementation. The cars you specifically mentioned are moves that were
>proposed by members or the SCAC, recommended by the SCAC, put out for member
>comment , then reviewed and accepted by the SEB. Simple class changes,
>not part of the reorg.
Ok, I'm confused...
From the June 4, 2000 FasTrack:
>ITEM 5: The SEB also approved separate SCAC recommendations to re-class
>the following cars, effective 1/1/2001. If the realignment occurs in
>2001, these cars will be placed in their appropriate corresponding classes
>per the new structure:
>
> Nissan Sentra SE-R, from DS to ES
> BMW M3 (E30), from AS to GS
> Toyota MR2 S/C, from AS to BS
> VW Rabbit GTI, from ES to HS
> Nissan NX2000, from DS to ES
> Ford Mustang SVO, from FS to GS
> Chrysler Conquest, from FS to GS
> Mitsubishi Starion Turbo, from FS to GS
So, if the above changes were recommended to go into effect on 1/1/2001,
then why is an E30 M3 listed in GS at the 2000 National Championship?
Did the national staff make a mistake, or did a class impacting change get
made 3 weeks before nationals?
Brad
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bradley Lamont
email: lamont@mailhost.org
http://www.mailhost.org/~lamont
|