RE: [solo2sc] Back to 8 Run Groups, and what it means for

To:	"'Pat Kelly'" <lollipop487@comcast.net>,
Subject:	RE: [solo2sc] Back to 8 Run Groups, and what it means for
From:	"Navid Kahangi" <navid@xperformance.com>
Date:	Wed, 1 Mar 2006 11:52:36 -0800

Without arguing the merits of one system over another, I should point this
fact out:  Collapsing the afternoon groups from 4 to 2 does nothing for the
fact that the morning groups are understaffed on events with attendance
under 230.

--Navid

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: [solo2sc] Back to 8 Run Groups, and what it means for, Navid Kahangi <= Re: [solo2sc] Back to 8 Run Groups, and what it means for, james creasy RE: [solo2sc] Back to 8 Run Groups, and what it means for, Navid Kahangi Re: [solo2sc] Back to 8 Run Groups, and what it means for, Katie Kelly Re: [solo2sc] Back to 8 Run Groups, and what it means for, james creasy Re: [solo2sc] Back to 8 Run Groups, and what it means for, John J. Stimson-III RE: [solo2sc] Back to 8 Run Groups, and what it means for, Katie Kelly Re: [solo2sc] Back to 8 Run Groups, and what it means for, svwilbur RE: [solo2sc] Back to 8 Run Groups, and what it means for, Navid Kahangi RE: [solo2sc] Back to 8 Run Groups, and what it means for, Katie Kelly RE: [solo2sc] Back to 8 Run Groups, and what it means for, John Kelly

Previous by Date:	RE: Back to 8 Run Groups, and what it means for SFR 2006, Jim Ochi
Next by Date:	Re: Back to 8 Run Groups, and what it means for SFR 2006, John J. Stimson-III
Previous by Thread:	Re: [solo2sc] Back to 8 Run Groups, and what it means for SFR, Pat Kelly
Next by Thread:	Re: [solo2sc] Back to 8 Run Groups, and what it means for, james creasy
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]