>Keith Hearn writes...
>
> >Until you know the basics, not thinking will just
> >cause problems.
>
>The idea is there is a method to learn the basics, one where your conscious
>mind is quiet. This will allow your subconsious mind to absorb the basics.
>The basics are important, yes, but
>learning them is analogous to a two-year old learning how to walk. There's
>a lot of clumsiness and awkwardness, much like running over a wall of
>cones, or spinning out, or taking a funky line. You make mistakes, but
>your critic is going to remain quiet as your subconscience pulls it all
>together. It sets the goals, but then it gets out of the way. This isn't
>supposed to be painful. Why, when you're just
>beginning, that's one of the most fun times. Even if you do spin out, hit
>ten cones, drive off the course, enjoy the sensations! This is not a final
>examination. Even the divisional coming up is just another opportunity to
>fall down, and get back up again.
Y'know, I would have sworn that I spoke to both Katie and Keith yesterday,
so it's surprising to find that we're on such completely divergent
planets...
KeS
More data! Must have more data for analysis. Input! Input!!
________________________________________________________________________
|