Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Triumph\s+TR6\s+on\s+the\s+dyno\s+\[long\]\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Triumph\s+TR6\s+on\s+the\s+dyno\s+\[long\]\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Triumph TR6 on the dyno [long] (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: 16 Sep 2000 19:08:24 -0000; Question: Just how much horsepower does a stock, US-smogged/carburetted Triumph TR6 produce? Good question, I asked. Non-US TR6s received the Lucas mecahnical fuel injection system which, in the 1969; /html/triumphs/2000-09/msg00816.html (9,301 bytes)
2. Re: Triumph TR6 on the dyno [long] (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2000 02:20:40 -0400; While you are totally correct about comparing HP across years as being impossible, from all the reading I've been doing the 104 and the 150hp figures are from the same years, which would be the early; /html/triumphs/2000-09/msg00838.html (8,266 bytes)
3. Re: Triumph TR6 on the dyno [long] (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2000 03:20:46 EDT; Hello Shane, I guess that 91hp for a tired stock motor, I'm clueless here. But when using a chassis dyno you suffer about a 15%-25% power loss due to the drivetrain plus between 1% to 3% loss due to; /html/triumphs/2000-09/msg00840.html (7,485 bytes)
4. Re: Triumph TR6 on the dyno [long] (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2000 04:55:18 -0400; Message text written by Trevor Boicey car got knocked down a few pegs, I think it finished up around 125hp. I am unsure of the details why, it wasn't emissions. Maybe it was trying to improve the rel; /html/triumphs/2000-09/msg00841.html (7,679 bytes)
5. Re: Triumph TR6 on the dyno [long] (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2000 21:18:33 +1100; Dave I seem to remember reading that the original PI engine was 134 bhp DIN, so the drop was about 9 bhp. The later engines had the same cam for both PI and carb, so the difference in power output mu; /html/triumphs/2000-09/msg00843.html (8,648 bytes)
6. Re: Triumph TR6 on the dyno [long] (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2000 13:46:43 +0200; Date sent: Sun, 17 Sep 2000 04:55:18 -0400 From David Massey <105671.471 at compuserve.com> Subject: Re: Triumph TR6 on the dyno [long] To: Trevor Boicey <tboicey@brit.ca> Copies to: "triumphs@autox.; /html/triumphs/2000-09/msg00845.html (8,815 bytes)
7. Re: Triumph TR6 on the dyno [long] (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: 17 Sep 2000 15:58:16 -0000; about a wheels. dyno? Yes, I do have O/D, but it was not used in the run. Several people have remarked that when they work out the hp at the flywheel, it comes in quite a bit higher than the factory; /html/triumphs/2000-09/msg00858.html (8,483 bytes)
8. Re: Triumph TR6 on the dyno [long] (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2000 21:22:17 -0400; Message text written by "J.H. Roulleaux" DIN figures should be the following: up to 72 - 98 HP DIN at 4900 RPM and from model year 73 - 95 HP DIN at 4500 RPM. The information is as published in facto; /html/triumphs/2000-09/msg00887.html (8,269 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]