Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*A\s+question\s+for\s+the\s+historians\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*A\s+question\s+for\s+the\s+historians\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. A question for the historians (score: 1): Author: richhalpern@comcast.net; Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 18:29:19 +0000; My early TR4 does not have the Triumph lettering on the hood or boot. Could the holes have been covered up by a PO, or is it possible some TR4s did not include the lettering? Rich 61TR4 == This list; /html/triumphs/2005-12/msg00411.html (7,573 bytes)
2. Re: A question for the historians (score: 1): Author: zoboherald@aol.com; Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 14:28:53 -0500; My early TR4 does not have the Triumph lettering on the hood or boot. Could the holes have been covered up by a PO, or is it possible some TR4s did not include the lettering? ==AM== The first cars di; /html/triumphs/2005-12/msg00414.html (8,381 bytes)
3. A question for the historians (score: 1): Author: "David Hammond" <d_hammond@charter.net>; Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 11:43:21 -0800; My early TR4 does not have the Triumph lettering on the hood or boot. Could the holes have been covered up by a PO, or is it possible some TR4s did not include the lettering? Rich 61TR4 Well, AFAIK,; /html/triumphs/2005-12/msg00415.html (8,756 bytes)
4. RE: A question for the historians (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 14:00:20 -0800; I've no idea if this would apply to TR4, but my late TR3A had no holes for the TRIUMPH letters across the nose. This was verified when the car was taken to bare metal for painting, no filler or weld; /html/triumphs/2005-12/msg00422.html (8,434 bytes)
5. Re: A question for the historians (score: 1): Author: Steven Newell <steven@newellboys.com>; Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 16:16:51 -0700; Andy, do you have a feel for just how early this was? Based on nothing but the vaguest of recollections, I was thinking the earliest prototype or show cars didn't have the script but pretty much all; /html/triumphs/2005-12/msg00428.html (8,906 bytes)
6. Re: A question for the historians (score: 1): Author: ZoboHerald@aol.com; Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 19:14:33 EST; Andy, do you have a feel for just how early this was? ==AM== Not exactly. But in Piggott's _Triumph; the sporting cars_, he noted in a picture caption on p.64 that "As was usual on the very early TR4; /html/triumphs/2005-12/msg00429.html (8,836 bytes)
7. Re: A question for the historians (score: 1): Author: "THOMAS FANSHER" <tfansher@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 19:44:52 -0500; In 1972 when I first got the TR3A, a teenage girl with a new driver's license ran a stop sign and I was the unfortunate person on the through street. I had just finished the 3 and it's new paint job.; /html/triumphs/2005-12/msg00435.html (9,247 bytes)
8. Re: A question for the historians (score: 1): Author: culturevirus <culturevirus@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 16:50:31 -0800 (PST); The bootlid on mine, CT1272L, is original (or appears to be) and does not have the TR4 script. It does have the TRIUMPH letters. We've narrowed the change down to less than a 100. Jerry Andy, do you; /html/triumphs/2005-12/msg00437.html (9,202 bytes)
9. Re: A question for the historians (score: 1): Author: "Kinderlehrer" <Kinderlehrer@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 17:50:01 -0800; There are 2 different types of letters on the TR3A (at least I think they were both intended for the TR#A), one in which the finish is smooth and one that isn't. Anyway, they have different hole patt; /html/triumphs/2005-12/msg00440.html (8,157 bytes)
10. Re: A question for the historians (score: 1): Author: philip ethier <pethier@isd.net>; Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 23:45:48 -0600; There is a TR4 badge on our CT2846L. Phil Ethier West Side Saint Paul Minnesota USA 1962 TR4 CT2846L, 1992 Saturn SL2, 1993 Suburban, 1994 Miata C package pethier@isd.net http://forum.mnautox.com/for; /html/triumphs/2005-12/msg00443.html (8,690 bytes)
11. RE: A question for the historians (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 23:26:30 -0800; Yes, that's exactly right. None of any significance, AFAIK. ISTR there are some minor differences that can only be seen with the apron off of the car, but they interchange other than the position of; /html/triumphs/2005-12/msg00445.html (8,575 bytes)
12. RE: A question for the historians (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 23:44:14 -0800; I believe I have evidence that this same theory IS applicable to the TR4 boot. At least assuming that the TR4A boot lid is the same. My TR4A SPC shows the lid as Stanpart 850442, while my TR250 SPC; /html/triumphs/2005-12/msg00446.html (8,861 bytes)
13. RE: A question for the historians (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 23:45:26 -0800; Randall babbled : Oops, sorry, meant Rich's car. Randall == This list supported in part by The Vintage Triumph Register == http://www.vtr.org; /html/triumphs/2005-12/msg00447.html (7,903 bytes)
14. RE: A question for the historians (score: 1): Author: richhalpern@comcast.net; Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 18:08:54 +0000; This time of year, it is great to get answers to my question, being it is of a holy nature. To drill or not to drill....blah blah blah. Thanks all! Rich 61 Tr4 CT1468LO == This list supported in part; /html/triumphs/2005-12/msg00454.html (7,809 bytes)
15. Re: A question for the historians (score: 1): Author: d spence <dkspence@telus.net>; Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 22:44:24 -0700; I have a period "Mitchell foreign interchange service" manual which covers TR 2 through 3B, TR4, 4A 250,6 SPITFIRE GT-6 STAG AND 2000. As regards the "lid assembly" it says the following. TRT4 & TR4A; /html/triumphs/2005-12/msg00480.html (10,435 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]