Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Help\s+needed\!\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Help\s+needed\!\!\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Help needed!! (score: 1): Author: Brian Furgalus <lennon80@usa.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Apr 1998 15:50:26 -0400; I'm relatively new to the Spitfire, and my interest is begining to peak. I'm 15, soon to be 16, and have been looking/saving for an LBC for quite a while, and for quite some time I've wanted an MGB.; /html/spitfires/1998-04/msg00337.html (7,637 bytes)
2. Re: Help needed!! (score: 1): Author: Mark Milotay <otmc@bc1.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Apr 1998 13:03:12 -0700; You should probably start out by checking the Triumph list archives. This subject was hashed out in a very long and drawn out battle over the merits of the 2 cars. Having owned both, I will say that; /html/spitfires/1998-04/msg00338.html (8,462 bytes)
3. Re: Help needed!! (score: 1): Author: larry hooven <dirty_howi@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Apr 1998 13:49:22 -0700 (PDT); first of all, welcome to our little 12 step program (sorry andy, i know plagerism, i'll head for my corner when im done, honest) Personally i prefer the spitfire, relatively easy to work on, you can; /html/spitfires/1998-04/msg00339.html (8,774 bytes)
4. RE: Help needed!! (score: 1): Author: Lee Daniels <DANIELS@alchem.chem.tamu.edu>; Date: Mon, 27 Apr 1998 16:25:46 -0500; Great. I suppose the Spitfire is *piquing* your interest too, no? ;-) One of my favorite cars I ever owned was the Spitfire. Not long after I sold it, I tried to buy it back - but no go. Tried again; /html/spitfires/1998-04/msg00341.html (8,760 bytes)
5. Re: Help needed!! (score: 1): Author: Atwell Haines <carbuff@scooter.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Apr 1998 17:13:15 -0400; Brian asked: Just look at the name of this mailing list, sonny, and you got yer answer: A SPITFIRE! Any LBC will prepare you for Automotive Engineering <wink-wink>, especially 1950's Engineering!!! S; /html/spitfires/1998-04/msg00342.html (7,940 bytes)
6. Re: Help needed!! (score: 1): Author: Brian Furgalus <lennon80@usa.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Apr 1998 20:25:17 -0400; How do I access the archives? I'm kinda new to this mailing-list thing, and it's all a little clunky for me! TIA, Brian.; /html/spitfires/1998-04/msg00344.html (8,777 bytes)
7. Re: Help needed!! (score: 1): Author: Trevor Boicey <tboicey@brit.ca>; Date: Mon, 27 Apr 1998 21:04:32 -0400; All conclusions aside, this point isn't really valid. I have seen MANY frame cars that had undriveable frames, but surprisingly few unit body cars that have actually caved. The MGB bodies are phenome; /html/spitfires/1998-04/msg00347.html (7,985 bytes)
8. Re: Help needed!! (score: 1): Author: Trevor Boicey <tboicey@brit.ca>; Date: Mon, 27 Apr 1998 21:54:45 -0400; Some evidence points to heating being significant. The "problem" seems worse in Midget 1500s than Spit 1500s, and it might be no coincidence that the Midget has a much more confined engine bay. As we; /html/spitfires/1998-04/msg00348.html (8,337 bytes)
9. Re: Help needed!! (score: 1): Author: James <james.carpenter@ukaea.org.uk>; Date: Tue, 28 Apr 1998 07:56:29 +0000; The main difference between the Spitfire and the MGB, is the MGB is a bigger more expensive car when new. A Spitfire has a solid backbone plus it's sills for strength, where as the MGB uses most of t; /html/spitfires/1998-04/msg00353.html (9,437 bytes)
10. Re: Help needed!! (score: 1): Author: Susan Hensley <susan@grotecon.com>; Date: Tue, 28 Apr 1998 10:04:27 -0500; Well, I have found the opposite, down here in Texas and Louisiana. Maybe it's the weather and lack of salt on the roads... I have a good friend with many MGB's (we go w-a-a-a-y back, so this hasn't b; /html/spitfires/1998-04/msg00355.html (9,013 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]