Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*supercharger\s*$/: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. Supercharger (score: 1)
Author: "Brinkman, Gerardo V" <GB127167@exchange.DAYTONOH.NCR.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 16:05:52 -0500
I finally got round to taking pictures of the supercharger installation on my MGB. If any one wants a copy of the pics I'll send via email. gerry /// /// mgs@autox.team.net mailing list /// or try ht
/html/mgs/2002-02/msg00270.html (7,477 bytes)

2. RE: Supercharger (score: 1)
Author: "Andrew B. Lundgren" <lundgren@byu.net>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 15:44:30 -0700 (MST)
Looks nice! Now for the questions! How does she run? What did you do to prepare your engine? Did you get is special grind camshaft as well? I saw you are using the Lucas sport coil, are you using an
/html/mgs/2002-02/msg00273.html (8,039 bytes)

3. RE: Supercharger (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry Erbesfield" <jerbesfield@mediaone.net>
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 11:45:41 -0500
Thank you for sending the pics! Looks absolutely BEAUTIFUL! Everything looks great, not just the supercharger. You've clearly done a nice job. I want this supercharger so bad I can taste it! I've bee
/html/mgs/2002-02/msg00279.html (9,225 bytes)

4. RE: Supercharger (score: 1)
Author: David Councill <dcouncil@imt.net>
Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2002 10:33:49 -0700
Which brings up my questions - are there any problems boring to .060 over? It seems like it wasn't that long ago when .040 over was the maximum. I need to rebuild my 72 engine which I'm fairly sure I
/html/mgs/2002-02/msg00281.html (8,682 bytes)

5. RE: Supercharger (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry Erbesfield" <jerbesfield@mediaone.net>
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 13:49:58 -0500
No problem David. Glad to answer. I have followed the links on the list on the .060 overbore subject for some time. Seems that the consensus of the list was that I was one of the lucky ones in that i
/html/mgs/2002-02/msg00285.html (11,221 bytes)

6. RE: Supercharger (score: 1)
Author: "Andrew B. Lundgren" <lundgren@byu.net>
Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2002 15:19:19 -0700
Interesting perspective. I would consider a 4 hour kit install less of a mod than a .060 overbore. The overbore is much harder to reverse... (If you ever chose too, but then again, you can't see the
/html/mgs/2002-02/msg00290.html (8,603 bytes)

7. RE: Supercharger (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry Erbesfield" <jerbesfield@mediaone.net>
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 19:55:47 -0500
David is going to an overhaul his engine anyhow - so while he's got the engine out and he's in there anyhow, the re-bore is NOT that much more of a chore or cost, even if it has to be sleeved to achi
/html/mgs/2002-02/msg00294.html (10,584 bytes)

8. Re: Supercharger (score: 1)
Author: Max Heim <mvheim@attbi.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 13:08:15 -0800
Well, the first question is, can you get pistons for anything more than a .060 overbore? -- Max Heim '66 MGB GHN3L76149 If you're near Mountain View, CA, it's the primer red one with chrome wires ///
/html/mgs/2002-02/msg00317.html (11,476 bytes)

9. RE: Supercharger (score: 1)
Author: "Maynard Hirsch" <mghirsch@netzero.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 15:38:58 -0600
If I was planning to put a supercharger on an engine, I would want to make sure that the comression ratio is correct. I believe (may be wrong) that you have to use low compression pistons so that you
/html/mgs/2002-02/msg00320.html (7,832 bytes)

10. Re: Supercharger (score: 1)
Author: Bob Shaw <shaws@mlcltd.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 18:47:36 -0600
Yes. Pistons .080 and, if memory serves me correctly .083 are available. The .083 pistons are the pistons that give one the 1950 CC engine. I have never run pistons that large- I run the .060 pistons
/html/mgs/2002-02/msg00327.html (8,984 bytes)

11. Re: Supercharger (score: 1)
Author: "Kai M. Radicke" <kmr@pil.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 20:44:51 -0500
No, that is not the reason for using low compression pistons. Your stock, either 8.7:1 or 8.0:1 (I think) pistons, will be fine for moderate (no more than 9psi) boost. Fuel and timing variables will
/html/mgs/2002-02/msg00328.html (9,286 bytes)

12. RE: Supercharger (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry Erbesfield" <jerbesfield@mediaone.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 21:39:12 -0500
No. It won't ruin the engine if the cylinder walls end up being a little too thin and your re-bore job cuts through it. They can be sleeved, which is a normal machine shop repair process that works v
/html/mgs/2002-02/msg00332.html (9,825 bytes)

13. RE: Supercharger (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry Erbesfield" <jerbesfield@mediaone.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 21:27:23 -0500
9:1 IS already low compression, at least by normal American hot rod standards. I'm more familiar from a muscle car viewpoint (as opposed to putting superchargers on a B engine) but on American hot ro
/html/mgs/2002-02/msg00333.html (8,891 bytes)

14. RE: Supercharger (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Hoy" <larryhoy@prodigy.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 21:54:49 -0700
a bit of trouble in an older LBC motor if you Help me out here Kai. What do you mean a "bit of trouble"? Are you saying that because the engine is old the extra HP may be an issue? Conversely, can I
/html/mgs/2002-02/msg00334.html (7,773 bytes)

15. supercharger (score: 1)
Author: Skye Poier <skye@ffwd.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 1999 13:48:53 -0800
180 hp?? Nice. I would imagine the engine would wear out pretty damn fast though... http://www.hi-flow.com/super_mgb.html Looks like a nice installation at any rate Skye -- 1966 MGB - GHN3L Safety Fa
/html/mgs/1999-12/msg01258.html (6,991 bytes)

16. Re: supercharger (score: 1)
Author: "Bert and Jen Ljungstrom" <bljungstrom@sympatico.ca>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 1999 19:59:11 -0500
I'm new to the list so please forgive any newbie oversights. I am in the midst of a complete rebuid of my '73 B roadster. I bought the car from under a tarp six years ago... Long story short - I just
/html/mgs/1999-12/msg01264.html (8,520 bytes)

17. Re: supercharger (score: 1)
Author: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 1999 18:41:14 -0800
Bert and Jen Ljungstrom had this to say: Plumbing, I should imagine. Anyway, the purpose of multiple carbs is more air flow. Supercharging takes care of that (and then some). Hate to have to balance
/html/mgs/1999-12/msg01265.html (7,293 bytes)

18. Re: supercharger (score: 1)
Author: "Neil Cotty" <neilc@apphosting.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 1999 21:04:42 +1100
Hi all, I buy most of my performance parts from Hans Pedersen who manufactures the supercharger for the MGB's, I asked him about the additional wear and this was his response: Engine wear with superc
/html/mgs/1999-12/msg01274.html (8,315 bytes)

19. Re: supercharger (score: 1)
Author: "Bert and Jen Ljungstrom" <bljungstrom@sympatico.ca>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 1999 12:01:42 -0500
That not a kick in the shins. Thats a kick somewhere completely different. Bert 73 B -- Original Message -- From: Andrew Lundgren <Andrew.Lundgren@level3.com> To: Bert and Jen Ljungstrom <bljungstrom
/html/mgs/1999-12/msg01294.html (9,650 bytes)

20. Re: supercharger (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Zambori" <eaz@snet.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 1999 12:38:52 -0500
Are you sure that's $4000 US and not $4000 Australian which I think would be about $2500 US? different.
/html/mgs/1999-12/msg01298.html (10,480 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu