Interesting perspective. I would consider a 4 hour kit install less of
a mod than a .060 overbore. The overbore is much harder to reverse...
(If you ever chose too, but then again, you can't see the overbore can
you...
On Sat, 09 Feb 2002 13:49:58 -0500, Jerry Erbesfield wrote:
>I personally believe increasing the bore as much as possible is very
>important. There is NO better or more cost effective way of boosting
>performance, which is so needed on our MG's and that doesn't affect the
>vehicle remaining "stock" (like wouldn't be the case with adding a
>supercharger). If you were to try the .060 overbore and then discover that
>you would have to "sleeve" the cylinders to successfully achieve it, that
>wouldn't be such a bad thing, IF the person you have doing the work is
>capable. The cost for sleeving is affordable (at least it was through my
>person).
--
Andrew Lundgren
lundgren@byu.net
http://lundgren.denver.co.us
///
/// mgs@autox.team.net mailing list
/// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
///
|