Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*351\s+Windsor\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*351\s+Windsor\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. 351 Windsor (score: 1): Author: Serge Berube <serge.ber@sympatico.ca>; Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 07:31:34 -0500; I would like to know if I would have to change the engine in my 75 B is there different 351 windsor.....if so would you know which is a perfect match.....and what car would have the same engine they; /html/bricklin/2001-02/msg00000.html (7,168 bytes)
2. Re: 351 Windsor (score: 1): Author: "Phil Martin" <pmartin_vacation@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 15:35:35 -0000; The '75 Granada motor is a perfect match, I believe. But there are very, very few external physical differences between different 351W's. Note that a 351C is a very different animal. If you're going; /html/bricklin/2001-02/msg00001.html (7,893 bytes)
3. Re: 351 Windsor (score: 1): Author: "High Tech Coatings" <htc@MNSi.Net>; Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 11:34:52 -0500; The only change I know of in 351W is the waterpump outlet, one is on the pass side and the other is on the driver side. The waterpumps are will bolt to any Windsor based engine so any 351 Windsor wil; /html/bricklin/2001-02/msg00002.html (8,039 bytes)
4. Re: 351 Windsor (score: 1): Author: "High Tech Coatings" <htc@MNSi.Net>; Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 12:59:29 -0500; The balance change was in the 302, in early 80's they switched from a 28 ounce to a 50 ounce balance weight. the 5.0 lt. uses the 50 ounce -- Original Message -- From: Phil Martin <pmartin_vacation@h; /html/bricklin/2001-02/msg00003.html (7,923 bytes)
5. Re: 351 Windsor (score: 1): Author: "alphachi" <alphachi@writeme.com>; Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 13:06:11 -0500; All yes, headers........ had to go with a set of hedman #88380, these are 1 1/2 shorties, that should handle up to 500hp w/ a 2 1/2" exhaust into a Flowmaster(according to shop), which means the 392/; /html/bricklin/2001-02/msg00004.html (8,969 bytes)
6. Re: 351 Windsor (score: 1): Author: Kenneth Parkman <Kenneth.Parkman@pwc.ca>; Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 18:14:01 -0500; A word of caution on interchanging Ford stuff - It will all interchange, but during the 30 year production of the 351W many things have been changed at one time or another. There are a number of inte; /html/bricklin/2001-02/msg00005.html (7,661 bytes)
7. Re: 351 Windsor (score: 1): Author: "John T. Blair" <jblair@exis.net>; Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 18:16:38 -0500; A couple of items I haven't seen in the various responces: 1. The Brick does NOT use the standard 351 eng pan. It uses a pan from an Econoline van to clear the eng. saddle. I believe I have some info; /html/bricklin/2001-02/msg00008.html (8,174 bytes)
8. Re: 351 Windsor (score: 1): Author: "Seth" <sbunin@provide.net>; Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 19:17:03 -0500; Ok, time for stupid questions: What is the benefit of yanking the manifolds and putting headers on? Thanks, Seth /// /// bricklin@autox.team.net mailing list ///; /html/bricklin/2001-02/msg00009.html (9,313 bytes)
9. Re: 351 Windsor (score: 1): Author: "alphachi" <alphachi@writeme.com>; Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 00:21:39 -0500; Ok, time for stupid questions: What is the benefit of yanking the manifolds and putting headers on? Thanks, Seth Not stupid actually. Well, let's see, 1) If you've seen the cast manifolds internally,; /html/bricklin/2001-02/msg00011.html (8,231 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]