Ok, time for stupid questions:
What is the benefit of yanking the manifolds and putting headers on?
Thanks,
Seth
#1544
On 2/1/01, at 1:06 PM, alphachi wrote:
>All yes, headers........ had to go with a set of hedman #88380, these are 1
>1/2 shorties, that should handle up to 500hp w/ a 2 1/2" exhaust into a
>Flowmaster(according to shop), which means the 392/3 will go nicely. If
>swapping motors, that is definitely the way to go (trust me). BTW,
>RICK, how is JET HOT for coatings. How do they get the stuff on the
>inside??
>
>stephan #2821
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "High Tech Coatings" <htc@MNSi.Net>
>To: "Serge Berube" <serge.ber@sympatico.ca>
>Cc: "bricklin" <Bricklin@autox.team.net>
>Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 11:34 AM
>Subject: Re: 351 Windsor
>
>
>> The only change I know of in 351W is the waterpump outlet, one is on the
>> pass side and the other is on the driver side. The waterpumps are will
>bolt
>> to any Windsor based engine so any 351 Windsor will be a match. Ford
>> motorsport offers a new 392 stroker engine which is a direct replacement
>and
>> varies only internally. these engines will turn your brick into a mover.
>the
>> only down fall is finding a set of headers that will fit. I am going to
>try
>> all the small block ford headers that come through my shop until I find a
>> set that fits (or comes close). I will then post my findings. If anybody
>> wants to know what doesn't fit, ask Stephan (alphachi) he has had many
>> attempts to fit and as of yet I believe has not been successful.
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Serge Berube <serge.ber@sympatico.ca>
>>
>> > I would like to know if I would have to change the engine in my 75 B is
>> > there different 351 windsor.....if so would you know which is a perfect
>> > match.....and what car would have the same engine they put in the
>> > 75....Did anyone did this yet... Thank in advance Serge vin 1733
///
/// bricklin@autox.team.net mailing list
///
|