Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*roll\s+cages\/bars\s+in\s+Solo2\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*roll\s+cages\/bars\s+in\s+Solo2\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. roll cages/bars in Solo2 (score: 1): Author: "James Rogerson" <jwalter@ptra.com>; Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 16:47:09 -0500; We don't need a definitive Solo2 cage rule that follows any road race or drag Here's why: We don't need mandatory roll over protection. We can't change seats in stock to accomplish driver's head clea; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00491.html (8,508 bytes)
2. Re: roll cages/bars in Solo2 (score: 1): Author: "Rick Brown" <free2000@quixnet.net>; Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 16:08:37 -0700; drag specifications. I assume you only mean stock classes, I have seen rollovers in prep/mod open cars. I have seen rollovers in stock/sp too, but they were low enough speed that there was really no; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00495.html (8,439 bytes)
3. Re: roll cages/bars in Solo2 (score: 1): Author: Hottvr@aol.com; Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 19:48:50 EDT; drag specifications. I must be missing something here? What sparked this debate? Is there something on the horizon that I didn't catch? Mike(It doesn't apply to me, but I would still like to know)B.; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00496.html (7,597 bytes)
4. Re: roll cages/bars in Solo2 (score: 1): Author: "Charles R. Schultz" <n2pua4@peoplepc.com>; Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 19:11:27 -0500; I think the issue folks are concerned about is that if you have a car quick enough to require an NHRA - legal cage, that cage is illegal in some solo classes, because NHRA requires it to be welded in; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00497.html (8,815 bytes)
5. Re: roll cages/bars in Solo2 (score: 1): Author: jwalter@ptra.com; Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 23:19:59 -0500; cars. I have seen rollovers in stock/sp too, but they were low enough speed that there was really no problem (other that a slightly crushed roof, etc.) Warning CAPS are for emphasis not shouting, th; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00510.html (9,074 bytes)
6. RE: roll cages/bars in Solo2 (score: 1): Author: "Colin Watson" <colinw@driverlabs.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 14:55:23 -0700; I have a car that I SoloII extensively but also has many, many track miles on lots of tracks during track days/drivers education events. Some of these tracks have been up to F1 standards, some have l; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00539.html (8,676 bytes)
7. Re: roll cages/bars in Solo2 (score: 1): Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com; Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 08:49:17 -0400; That's pretty well the gist of it. There's also the fact that there are lots of people who do track days with their SP/SM cars, and so really need rollover protection, and who want the extra safety/s; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00560.html (8,564 bytes)
8. Re: roll cages/bars in Solo2 (score: 1): Author: Reijo Silvennoinen <rase@istar.ca>; Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 14:25:08 -0600; Ask an engineer - which is stronger - bolted or welded? Answer: Neither. Why? Well, you can design either connection to be stronger....e.g. you can design a bolted connection to be stronger than a we; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00572.html (8,378 bytes)
9. Re: roll cages/bars in Solo2 (score: 1): Author: Paul Foster <pfoster@gdi.net>; Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2000 09:56:10 -0400; <<<This would mean that any car with a GCR IT-SS cage, or an NHRA cage, be SoloII legal. And that's a huge win, IMHO.>>> Yes it would. Dennis is right for a change. ;-) Sorry to confuse some people w; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00580.html (7,396 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]