Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*ST\s+as\s+a\s+National\s+Class\s+\(was\s+\?\!\?\!\?\!\)\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. ST as a National Class (was ?!?!?!) (score: 1)
Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 13:43:18 -0700
I couldn't find it in the rulebook but: If a class is undersubscribed for 3 consecutive years, then it gets eliminated from National Competition. Would it then make sense that a new class has to demo
/html/autox/2000-10/msg00884.html (8,810 bytes)

2. ST as a National Class (was ?!?!?!) (score: 1)
Author: "Linnhoff, Eric" <elinnhoff@smmc.saint-lukes.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 16:00:34 -0500
I couldn't find it in the rulebook but: If a class is undersubscribed for 3 consecutive years, then it gets eliminated from National Competition. Would it then make sense that a new class has to demo
/html/autox/2000-10/msg00887.html (8,197 bytes)

3. RE: ST as a National Class (was ?!?!?!) (score: 1)
Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 14:00:56 -0700
Well I will tell you what it takes: a firm set of rules! And if I'm not mistaken, ST does not have that! FP is not a new CATEGORY, just a new subset (or class) of an existing structure. Street Tourin
/html/autox/2000-10/msg00888.html (8,968 bytes)

4. Re: ST as a National Class (was ?!?!?!) (score: 1)
Author: "Phillip Osborne" <psosborn@gte.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 16:04:23 -0400
Didn't happen that way for Formula 125... Phil O. -- Original Message -- From: <Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com> To: "Dave Kizerian" <davekizerian@hotmail.com> Cc: <autox@autox.team.net> Sent: Tuesda
/html/autox/2000-10/msg00890.html (9,706 bytes)

5. RE: ST as a National Class (was ?!?!?!) (score: 1)
Author: "Linnhoff, Eric" <elinnhoff@smmc.saint-lukes.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 16:41:21 -0500
Well then, who do we have to kill to get a real, firm set of rules? Like NOW. I'm impatient as I'm sure are the rest of the ST participants. It should be quite obvious by now that the ST classes are
/html/autox/2000-10/msg00894.html (8,456 bytes)

6. Re: ST as a National Class (was ?!?!?!) (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Kizerian" <davekizerian@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 16:04:19 -0600
Here's the "LIST" Steve Wynne Kei Josepheson Jack Burns Bret Norgaard Ron Conrad Debbie Fessler Stan Whitney, SEB Liaison
/html/autox/2000-10/msg00898.html (7,627 bytes)

7. Re: ST as a National Class (was ?!?!?!) (score: 1)
Author: washburn <washburn@dwave.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 18:13:29 -0500
dot, dot, dot...now that you are running in it. ;-P Pat
/html/autox/2000-10/msg00901.html (7,608 bytes)

8. RE: ST as a National Class (was ?!?!?!) (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Lloyd" <Jeff@cyberconceptz.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 20:16:25 -0400
A little birdie told me that a certain ESP M3 driver (I won't mention any names :-) is preparing a 328is for STS The fact alone that the class can draw this type of talent is proof that it IS a natio
/html/autox/2000-10/msg00904.html (8,210 bytes)

9. Re: ST as a National Class (was ?!?!?!) (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Linnhoff" <eric10mm@qni.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 01:00:47 -0500
Amen brother Jeff. Now sell the Z-pig and get a 4 door Bimmer. ;^) Eric Linnhoff in KC '98 Neon R/T <eric10mm@qni.com> "Fill what's empty, empty what's full, and scratch where it itches." The Duchess
/html/autox/2000-10/msg00911.html (8,009 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu