autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: ST as a National Class (was ?!?!?!)

To: "team.net" <autox@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: ST as a National Class (was ?!?!?!)
From: "Phillip Osborne" <psosborn@gte.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 16:04:23 -0400
Didn't happen that way for Formula 125...

Phil O.
----- Original Message -----
From: <Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com>
To: "Dave Kizerian" <davekizerian@hotmail.com>
Cc: <autox@autox.team.net>
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2000 4:43 PM
Subject: ST as a National Class (was ?!?!?!)


>
>
> I couldn't find it in the rulebook but:
>
> If a class is undersubscribed for 3 consecutive years, then it gets
eliminated
> from National Competition.
>
> Would it then make sense that a new class has to demonstrate a proper
> subscription level for those same 3 years?
>
> Just my thoughts...
>
> AB
>
>
>
>
>
> "Dave Kizerian" <davekizerian@hotmail.com> on 10/24/2000 04:45:37 PM
>
> Please respond to "Dave Kizerian" <davekizerian@hotmail.com>
>
> To:   Jkinser77@aol.com, autox@autox.team.net
> cc:    (bcc: Andrew Bettencourt/FIELD SALES/Kingston)
>
> Subject:  Re: ?!?What does this mean?!?!?
>
>
>
>
> The Quote was directly off of the SCCA website....
> http://www.scca.org/news/tech/seb/9-26-00.html
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <Jkinser77@aol.com>
> To: <davekizerian@hotmail.com>; <autox@autox.team.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2000 2:25 PM
> Subject: Re: ?!?What does this mean?!?!?
>
>
> > In a message dated 10/24/00 12:50:32 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
> > davekizerian@hotmail.com writes:
> >
> > << Am I right in beleiving that this means STS is still not an oficial
> class
> >  for 2001?!? >>
> > I know it was not for this year an offical Nationals class, but this is
> for
> > 2001 also?  that doesn't seem right to me...if it is, what is the
> reasoning?
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>