Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*SP\/SM\s+and\s+costs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*SP\/SM\s+and\s+costs\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. RE: SP/SM and costs (score: 1): Author: "Richard Atkins" <richarda@npclabels.com>; Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 10:38:53 -0500; It's funny you should mention SM costs.... SM, being born out of STS, and STR, was seen as the ultimate class for cheap street cars. Anyway, do y'all know what the tab on this beut was? The owner gue; /html/autox/2001-05/msg00002.html (7,224 bytes)
2. RE: SP/SM and costs (score: 1): Author: "Richard Atkins" <richarda@npclabels.com>; Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 10:41:18 -0500; And we will see cars that cost this much in SM, high budget cars win, look at AP in 99, the car that won was $250,000 (my guess). It has always been apparent that SM could be one of the highest cost; /html/autox/2001-05/msg00003.html (8,015 bytes)
3. RE: SP/SM and costs (score: 1): Author: "Jodi Fordahl" <soundtire@email.msn.com>; Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 12:08:51 -0700; Correction, the car that won AP in 1999 wasn't even half that much. Since the 911 GTR and GTRS have come out the prices on the RSR's are dropping. -Jodi Fordahl 1999 APL Champ And we will see cars th; /html/autox/2001-05/msg00013.html (8,512 bytes)
4. SP/SM and costs (score: 1): Author: "Ron Chapman" <CHAPMANR@calbt.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 14:53:55 -0700; Some of the posts on this issue show a belief that SM is an affordable class. My opinion is that it may be so only as long as remains smog legal and isn't a national class. Sure, some of the SM mods; /html/autox/2001-04/msg00806.html (9,425 bytes)
5. Re: SP/SM and costs (score: 1): Author: jeff@winchell.com; Date: 26 Apr 2001 15:37:31 -0700; SFC is only one of a few common issues for ESP Mustangs (plus there are a couple of legal options there anyway). The other big SP killers are rear gear selection, rear lower control arms... and then; /html/autox/2001-04/msg00811.html (8,869 bytes)
6. RE: SP/SM and costs (score: 1): Author: "Eric Salem" <eric@mail.brown911.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 17:49:57 -0500; I'd have to agree with Ron on this. The other day on this list I estimated the cost for a SM2 killer 911 / 914-6 400hp motor in a 2000 pound car. That figure was 8 times higher than what I spent on a; /html/autox/2001-04/msg00812.html (10,159 bytes)
7. Re: SP/SM and costs (score: 1): Author: "Ron Chapman" <CHAPMANR@calbt.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 15:59:26 -0700; I should confess that my German car giggles were more for relief over the fact that I wasn't having to race it in CSP anymore than wishing this competition onto others... Ron 84 CRX CSP 99 Miata BS; /html/autox/2001-04/msg00814.html (7,058 bytes)
8. Re: SP/SM and costs (score: 1): Author: "Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net>; Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 21:10:32 -0500; class. My opinion is that it may be so only as long as remains smog legal and isn't a national class. Quite. mods on street cars (subframe connectors, camshafts). But, since it isn't a national class; /html/autox/2001-04/msg00822.html (8,592 bytes)
9. Re: SP/SM and costs (score: 1): Author: "Mike Smith" <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 01:57:12 -0400; It's funny you should mention SM costs.... SM, being born out of STS, and STR, was seen as the ultimate class for cheap street cars. Then, the rules came out, and, I gotta tell ya, a full-boogie SM c; /html/autox/2001-04/msg00827.html (8,051 bytes)
10. RE: SP/SM and costs (score: 1): Author: "Eric Salem" <eric@mail.brown911.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 01:19:29 -0500; It might actually be cheaper in a few years to buy the current speedvision cup championship car and lower the gearing than to build one from scratch. <<It's funny you should mention SM costs.... SM,; /html/autox/2001-04/msg00828.html (7,535 bytes)
11. Re: SP/SM and costs (score: 1): Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com; Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 10:10:49 -0400; cheap Actually, no, it wasn't. There's no way you could have a hand in the making of those rules, and NOT see that the potential for expense that was built into the class. SM was/is seen as the class; /html/autox/2001-04/msg00836.html (11,059 bytes)
12. Re: SP/SM and costs (score: 1): Author: "Mike Smith" <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 23:04:59 -0400; You might want to check with the member of the SM list about that. It seems to me that most think it's STS with race tires and boost controllers. SP doesn't allow replacement suspension arms, IRS re; /html/autox/2001-04/msg00853.html (10,116 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]